2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-013-9490-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Provability Logics with Linearly Ordered Modalities

Abstract: We introduce the logics GLP Λ , a generalization of Japaridze's polymodal provability logic GLP ω where Λ is any linearly ordered set representing a hierarchy of provability operators of increasing strength.We shall provide a reduction of these logics to GLP ω yielding among other things a finitary proof of the normal form theorem for the variablefree fragment of GLP Λ and the decidability of GLP Λ for recursive orderings Λ. Further, we give a restricted axiomatization of the variable-free fragment of GLP Λ .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the formula M + (ϕ) is, in a sense, inconvenient since its size does not depend on the size of ϕ and, additionally, M + (ϕ) is not necessarily in the language of ϕ. We borrow a result from [10] to improve upon that. Let m 1 ϕ 1 , m 2 ϕ 2 , .…”
Section: Further Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the formula M + (ϕ) is, in a sense, inconvenient since its size does not depend on the size of ϕ and, additionally, M + (ϕ) is not necessarily in the language of ϕ. We borrow a result from [10] to improve upon that. Let m 1 ϕ 1 , m 2 ϕ 2 , .…”
Section: Further Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the other direction, suppose GLP R + Θ (ϕ) → ϕ. It follows from results of[7] together with a result of[10] that this implies…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We note that replacing propositional constants by propositional variables in a formula does not change its derivability in GLP. Therefore, using Lemma 3.5 (which was essentially proved in [21]), we easily see that the new formulations of Lemmas 3.6 and 6.3 (to be given below) are equivalent to the original ones.…”
Section: Consider the Setmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Remark 4.10. The given proof also works for the more general analogs of RC, e.g., for logics with linearly ordered sets of modalities (see [1]).…”
Section: We Say That a Sequentmentioning
confidence: 96%