2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On recognizing land administration as critical, public good infrastructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These new and often cross-cutting issues may threaten traditional forest bureaucracies through, e.g., a redistribution of power among a number of land-use-related state agencies. Fundamentally, state agencies, as bureaucratic politics and related literature reveal (e.g., Krott, 2005;Olsen, 2006;Peters, 2001;Giessen et al, 2014;Buijs et al, 2014;Kumar and Kant, 2005;Bennett et al, 2012Bennett et al, , 2013, compete for power in the form of formal mandates to pursue policies in these emerging issue areas and to acquire staff and budgets. This competition for power has been identified as an important factor in land use and forest politics (Pedersen, 2010;Krott et al, 2014;Aurenhammer, 2011Aurenhammer, , 2012Ojha et al, 2014;Ongolo, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new and often cross-cutting issues may threaten traditional forest bureaucracies through, e.g., a redistribution of power among a number of land-use-related state agencies. Fundamentally, state agencies, as bureaucratic politics and related literature reveal (e.g., Krott, 2005;Olsen, 2006;Peters, 2001;Giessen et al, 2014;Buijs et al, 2014;Kumar and Kant, 2005;Bennett et al, 2012Bennett et al, , 2013, compete for power in the form of formal mandates to pursue policies in these emerging issue areas and to acquire staff and budgets. This competition for power has been identified as an important factor in land use and forest politics (Pedersen, 2010;Krott et al, 2014;Aurenhammer, 2011Aurenhammer, , 2012Ojha et al, 2014;Ongolo, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secure property rights are argued to be a key welfare‐enhancing function of the state that enables development (North ). Finally, effective land administration has been seen as a critical public good (Bennett et al ) and cadasters as the “engine of land administration” (Williamson et al , 3). Overall, cadasters have been described as “an instrument of control which both reflects and consolidates the power of those who commission it” (Kain and Baigent , 344).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land administration systems (LASs) are a vital instrument of sustainable development and good governance. This good governance is provided through the concept of spatial data infrastructure (SDI) [6] [7], the land administration domain model (LADM) [1] and the property right infrastructures (PRI) [8]. These land administration systems provide services to the public [9] through availability of spatial information.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%