2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics: The Ministry of Forestry and its competitors in the REDD+ Programme and the One Map Policy in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
44
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The various government agencies involved in evaluating applications for concessions sometimes lack accurate and up-to-date information on peat location, peat depth, existing concessions and pending concessions applications. By preparing an updated national peat map, the current One-Map policy by Indonesia government may improve the basic data as a basis for decision making (Wibowo and Giessen 2015).…”
Section: Uncertainties In Baseline Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various government agencies involved in evaluating applications for concessions sometimes lack accurate and up-to-date information on peat location, peat depth, existing concessions and pending concessions applications. By preparing an updated national peat map, the current One-Map policy by Indonesia government may improve the basic data as a basis for decision making (Wibowo and Giessen 2015).…”
Section: Uncertainties In Baseline Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while the State remains the legitimate coordinator of REDD+ at the national level-through the forestry sector, most practical implementation of REDD+ projects in Kenya and globally are undertaken by the private sector and NGOs (Atela et al, 2014). In this context, it is possible that as REDD+ moves to full implementation and as many stakeholders become active in the programme, the relative power of the forestry sector could decline as was observed in Indonesia (Wibowo and Giessen 2015).…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagement In Redd+ Implementation: Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of forest governance this is evident in the awarding of forest concession permits, or access to decision-making processes by political elites to their supporters. The opposite is effected through preventing access to policy-making or economic advantages (e.g., the revocation of permits) [30]. 'Dominant information' is particularly evident during policy-making processes, whereby powerful state actors (considered as the principal source of information) hold the power to influence a policy outcome, as they decide the type and verifiability of the information distributed, and to which actors the information is available [30,53].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By positioning REDD+ in this broader context of institutional interplay and political economy, this paper complements and extends literature on REDD+ governance that analyses (i) the challenges and opportunities for the REDD+ initiative to effect forest governance reform [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and (ii) the potential social and economic impacts of REDD+ policies on local people and communities' participation on project implementations [31][32][33][34][35][36]. Moreover, concepts from political economy have been deployed to explore the challenge of REDD+ in creating incentives for forest conservation that are able to 'out-compete' other interests, such as timber, mining, and agricultural economics [10,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation