On relations between Kirchhoff index, Laplacian energy, Laplacian-energy-like invariant and degree deviation of graphs

Abstract

Let G be a simple connected graph of order n and size m, vertex degree sequence d1 ? d2 ?...? dn > 0, and let ?1 ? ? 2 ? ... ? ?n-1 > ?n = 0 be the eigenvalues of its Laplacian matrix. Laplacian energy LE, Laplacian-energy-like invariant LEL and Kirchhoff index Kf, are graph invariants defined in terms of Laplacian eigenvalues. These are, respectively, defined as LE(G) = ?n,i=1 |?i-2m/n|, LEL(G) = ?n-1 i=1 ??i and Kf (G) = n ?n-1,i=1 1/?i. A vertex-degree-based topological index referred to as degree deviation is defined as S(G) = ?n,i=1 |di- 2m/n|. Relations between Kf and LE, Kf and LEL, as well as Kf and S are obtained.

Computing Laplacian energy, Laplacian-energy-like invariant and Kirchhoff index of graphs

“…where F, M 1 and C 3 are the Forgotten index, first Zagreb index and the number of the triangles, respectively. And equality occurs if and only if For the Laplacian, we have Equality case can be proved as the equality shown in Theorem 3.1 in [14]. This completes the proof.…”

Theoretical justification of Ventcel's boundary conditions for a thin layer three-dimensional thermoelasticity problem

“…Step 1: A priori estimate Let us now consider the energy function, see the definition e.g. in [17,19,21] and references therein. Then, we denote by E(t) the energy of the system for t ̸ = 0…”

Energy concentration of the p-Landau-Lifschitz functional with radial structure

“…In addition, it is helpful to understand the dynamics of singularities appearing in the liquid crystals (cf. [2,7,12,14] and [6]). In particular, the authors of [7] discussed the asymptotic behaviour of the radial minimizer of E ε (u, B) in §5.…”