2014
DOI: 10.1186/1687-5281-2014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On required accuracy of mixed noise parameter estimation for image enhancement via denoising

Abstract: Characteristics of noise (type, statistics, spatial correlation) are nowadays exploited in many image denoising and enhancement methods. However, these characteristics are often unknown, and they have to be extracted from an image at hand. There are many powerful and accurate blind methods for noise variance estimation for the cases of additive and multiplicative noise models. However, more complicated noise models containing a mixture of signal-independent (SI) and signal-dependent (SD) components are often m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, inferring data labels and removing the least critical objects from the LiDAR point cloud before transmission guarantee quasi real-time operations as encoding and decoding times never exceed the LiDAR inter-frame time. Finally, even in the most aggressive, space-saving configuration (i.e., HSC-2), the PSNR is still guaranteed to be above 50 dB (a typical acceptable value for wireless transmission quality loss at which distortions in compressed frames can be hardly noticed [26]) when BPP > 5. This is also validated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, inferring data labels and removing the least critical objects from the LiDAR point cloud before transmission guarantee quasi real-time operations as encoding and decoding times never exceed the LiDAR inter-frame time. Finally, even in the most aggressive, space-saving configuration (i.e., HSC-2), the PSNR is still guaranteed to be above 50 dB (a typical acceptable value for wireless transmission quality loss at which distortions in compressed frames can be hardly noticed [26]) when BPP > 5. This is also validated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Кроме того, эти помехи могут быть в значительной степени пространственно коррелированными [10 -12]. Несмотря на достаточно большое количество методов автоматического оценивания характеристик помех, разработанных к настоящему моменту [10 -16], среди них нет универсального решения, способного обеспечить приемлемую точность оценивания [17] и быстродействие во всех практических ситуациях, поэтому задача разработки новых методов и усовершенствования уже существующих решений не утрачивает своей актуальности.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Meanwhile, HVS-based metric does it better but also not perfectly [35]. Our experience with the metric M HVS PSNR [41] shows that improvement of visual quality becomes noticeable if M HVS PSNR increases by, at least, 0.5…1 dB. To make the final conclusions, consider simulation data for the metric M HVS IPSNR .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%