2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9111303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Riemann—Liouville and Caputo Fractional Forward Difference Monotonicity Analysis

Abstract: Monotonicity analysis of delta fractional sums and differences of order υ∈(0,1] on the time scale hZ are presented in this study. For this analysis, two models of discrete fractional calculus, Riemann–Liouville and Caputo, are considered. There is a relationship between the delta Riemann–Liouville fractional h-difference and delta Caputo fractional h-differences, which we find in this study. Therefore, after we solve one, we can apply the same method to the other one due to their correlation. We show that y(z)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 5. As we have discussed in our recently published article [22], it is impossible to obtain fractional difference MVT for the CFC case, i.e., the following inequalities…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5. As we have discussed in our recently published article [22], it is impossible to obtain fractional difference MVT for the CFC case, i.e., the following inequalities…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where A is some nonnegative number and Δ 𝛼 y is some type of fractional difference of y. Studies of this form include papers by Atici et al, 23 Du et al, 24 Goodrich, 25 Goodrich and Jonnalagadda, 26 Goodrich et al, 27 Jia et al, [28][29][30] Liu et al, 31 Mohammed et al, 32,33 Suwan et al, 34 and Suwan et al 35 ; we point out, off hand, that, somewhat curiously, there does not seem to be the same sort of activity in the continuous fractional frame, and, in fact, the only work of which we are aware in this direction is a paper by Diethelm. 36 Usually in these studies, the number A in (1.2) has been taken to be 0 since this is the natural and obvious analogue of the integer-order setting in which one has the result "(Δy)(𝜏) ≥ 0 ⇒ y is increasing."…”
Section: Some Additional Conditions (If Necessary)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there are papers that have studied a single fractional difference—i.e., theorems that take the following form: ()normalΔαmonospaceyfalse(nfalse)ASome Additional Conditions (if necessary)0.30emmonospacey.5emis positive and/or monotone and/or convex, where A is some nonnegative number and Δ α y is some type of fractional difference of y. Studies of this form include papers by Atici et al, 23 Du et al, 24 Goodrich, 25 Goodrich and Jonnalagadda, 26 Goodrich et al, 27 Jia et al, 28–30 Liu et al, 31 Mohammed et al, 32,33 Suwan et al, 34 and Suwan et al 35 ; we point out, off hand, that, somewhat curiously, there does not seem to be the same sort of activity in the continuous fractional frame, and, in fact, the only work of which we are aware in this direction is a paper by Diethelm 36 . Usually in these studies, the number A in () has been taken to be 0 since this is the natural and obvious analogue of the integer‐order setting in which one has the result “ false(normalΔmonospaceyfalse)false(τfalse)0monospacey.5emis increasing.” Nonetheless, the recent paper by Goodrich and Lizama 37 studied in extensive detail the case in which A > 0, and a subsequent paper by Goodrich and Muellner 38 also considered such cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrete fractional calculus (DFC) is a field of mathematical analysis and it is a new branch of continuous fractional calculus that is responsible for studying the discrete operators of the sum and difference of fractional order on domains of discrete functions. The definitions of DFC models with singular and nonsingular kernels have been studied by researchers in recent years (see [1][2][3][4][5][6]). Currently, many definitions of nabla (or backward) fractional differences, ∇ υ , have been adopted in order to modify and generalize the concept of ordinary nabla difference, so that for υ = 1, the first-order nabla difference can be recovered, which is usually defined for any function h as ∇h(x) = h(x) − h(x − 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%