SAE Technical Paper Series 2009
DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-1866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Road Test and Evaluation of Emissions and Fuel Economy of the Hybrid Electric Bus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series HEV, the thermal (diesel) engine, coupled with a brushless electric generator (the couple is named the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU)), is used to generate electricity with an almost constant power and with optimal efficiency, whereas an electric motor generator is used for traction and regenerative braking, and the battery pack is used as an energy buffer. Simulations and field tests measurements [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] show that HE buses can give fuel economy benefits ranging from 24.8% to 66% with respect to traditional diesel engine-powered buses. Such a huge variability in terms of fuel economy is due to a large number of parameters playing an important role in determining the actual fuel consumption, such as the number of stops per unit distance, the road grade, surrounding traffic volume and conditions, environmental conditions, driving style, type of hybrid technology, roadway type, passenger load and plug-in capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series HEV, the thermal (diesel) engine, coupled with a brushless electric generator (the couple is named the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU)), is used to generate electricity with an almost constant power and with optimal efficiency, whereas an electric motor generator is used for traction and regenerative braking, and the battery pack is used as an energy buffer. Simulations and field tests measurements [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] show that HE buses can give fuel economy benefits ranging from 24.8% to 66% with respect to traditional diesel engine-powered buses. Such a huge variability in terms of fuel economy is due to a large number of parameters playing an important role in determining the actual fuel consumption, such as the number of stops per unit distance, the road grade, surrounding traffic volume and conditions, environmental conditions, driving style, type of hybrid technology, roadway type, passenger load and plug-in capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possible ways of evaluating the data derived from a test and for extracting conclusions by means of the use of statistical tools. For the evaluation of the mean value, the parameters registered or calculated along the route tested have been the most commonly used tool during comparative studies (Van Poppel and Lenaers 2005, Cocker et al 2004, Pelkmans and Debal 2006, Frey et al 2007, Ropkins et al 2007, Durbin et al 2007, Qin et al 2009, López et al 2009. Mean values provide global information about a studied parameter but this information depends on many uncontrolled factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%