2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4916(03)00074-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On short and semi-short representations for four-dimensional superconformal symmetry

Abstract: Possible short and semi-short representations for N = 2 and N = 4 superconformal symmetry in four dimensions are discussed. For N = 4 the well known short supermultiplets whose lowest dimension conformal primary operators correspond to -BPS states and are scalar fields belonging to the SU(4) r symmetry representations [0, p, 0] and [q, p, q] and having scale dimension ∆ = p and ∆ = 2q+p respectively are recovered. The representation content of semi-short multiplets, which arise at the unitarity threshold for l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
760
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(775 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
15
760
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Kähler potential satisfying our requirement is 8) up to an irrelevant constant. Given the definition of y in (7.6), it follows that for y ≪ 1, the six-dimensional base is toric, with a U(1) 3 isometry.…”
Section: Jhep10(2007)003mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A Kähler potential satisfying our requirement is 8) up to an irrelevant constant. Given the definition of y in (7.6), it follows that for y ≪ 1, the six-dimensional base is toric, with a U(1) 3 isometry.…”
Section: Jhep10(2007)003mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, unlike for LLM geometries, in these cases the supersymmetry analysis is not particularly constructive. For example, it was found in [20] that 1/8 BPS configurations with an S 3 isometry may be written using a metric of the form ds 2 10 = −e 2α (dt + ω) 2 + e −2α h ij dx i dx j + e 2α dΩ 2 3 , ( 8) where h ij is a Kähler metric of complex dimension three. In the end, the invariant tensor analysis does not provide an actual procedure for obtaining this metric short of solving a non-linear equation on its curvature [20] 6 R = −R ij R ij + 1 2 R 2 .…”
Section: Jhep10(2007)003mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not possible because four-dimensional N = 2 SCFTs cannot have enhanced global symmetries as exactly marginal couplings are continuously varied, without having also enhanced higher-spin symmetries (see also [22,23]). We can see this by examining the list of allowed multiplets of the four-dimensional N = 2 superconformal algebra [24][25][26][27][28], in which there is no superconformal multiplet including a vector operator with a dimension that continuously goes down to the conserved current dimension ∆ = 3, without containing also additional conserved currents of higher spins. 13 Indeed, there are several loose points in the expectation that such an enhanced SU(K) gauge symmetry should arise.…”
Section: Jhep03(2015)121mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous exact computations of Wilson loop operators [19] indicated hierarchically separated BPS string tensions in the singular limit. 28 Extensions to 't Hooft loops and some correlation functions are straightforward, and the correlation functions of loop operators should be compared with those of the BPS strings in the six-dimensional N = (2, 0) theory on AdS 5 × S 1 . Equating the two computations, we should be able to extract the relation between the position in the 'moduli space' and the couplings of the SU(K) and P (K) theories [67,68].…”
Section: Rigid Holography Made Precisementioning
confidence: 99%