2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1203.2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On snarks that are far from being 3-edge colorable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that a cubic bridgeless graph has excessive index 3 if and only if it is 3-edge-colorable, and deciding the latter is NP-complete. Hägglund [8,Problem 3] asked if it is possible to give a characterization of all cubic graphs with excessive index 5. In Section 2, we prove that the structure of cubic bridgeless graphs with excessive index at least five is far from trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that a cubic bridgeless graph has excessive index 3 if and only if it is 3-edge-colorable, and deciding the latter is NP-complete. Hägglund [8,Problem 3] asked if it is possible to give a characterization of all cubic graphs with excessive index 5. In Section 2, we prove that the structure of cubic bridgeless graphs with excessive index at least five is far from trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A question raised by Fouquet and Vanherpe [6] is whether the Petersen graph is the unique snark with excessive index at least five. This question was answered by the negative by Hägglund using a computer program [8]. He proved that the smallest snark distinct from the Petersen graph having excessive index at least five is a graph H on 34 vertices (see Figure 7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this shows that any cubic bridgeless graph G whose edge-set can be covered by 4 perfect matchings satisfies m 3 (G) ≥ 5 6 . It follows that the conjecture stating that every cubic bridgeless graph G satisfies m 3 (G) ≥ 4 5 only needs to be verified for graphs whose edge-set cannot be covered by 4 perfect matchings (some results on this class of graphs can be found in [3] and [6]). Recall that Kaiser, Král', and Norine [8] proved that every cubic bridgeless graph G satisfies m 2 (G) ≥ 3 5 .…”
Section: Theorem 7 Conjecture 4 Implies That Any Cubic Bridgeless Gra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G e can be edge-3-colored) for every edge e of G. Not all snarks are critical. (In fact some snarks G are so severely "anti-critical" that ψ(G, e) = 0 for every edge of G; for further information and earlier references on such snarks, see [BGHM,Section 4.7] and [Hä,Section 3]. ) Starting with the Petersen graph and Theorem 3.5, and applying induction using [Br2, Theorem 2.2 and subsequent sentence], one obtains Theorem 5.1 in Section 5 above with the word "snark" replaced by the phrase "critical snark".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%