2018
DOI: 10.1215/20088752-2017-0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On solving proximal split feasibility problems and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that the SFP can also be used in the air traffic flow management problems. Many researchers studied the SFP and introduced various algorithms to solve it (see [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and references therein). The original algorithm introduced in [1] involves the computation of the inverse A −1 (assuming the existence of the inverse of A) and thus does not become popular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that the SFP can also be used in the air traffic flow management problems. Many researchers studied the SFP and introduced various algorithms to solve it (see [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and references therein). The original algorithm introduced in [1] involves the computation of the inverse A −1 (assuming the existence of the inverse of A) and thus does not become popular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we use Γ to denote the solution set of the problem (2). The above problem (2) has been studied extensively in the literature, see for instance [31][32][33][34][35]. In order to solve problem (2), in [36], Moudafi and Thakur presented the following split proximal algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is remarked that some related best proximity point theorems for proximal contractions, proximal cyclic contractions and cyclic contractions can be found in the references [4][5][6][7][10][11][12]. Further, some applications of proximality can be found in the references [2,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%