1995
DOI: 10.1016/0927-0248(95)80004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On some thermodynamic aspects of photovoltaic solar energy conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If we bear in mind that in a real situation the solar cell does not operate always in maximum concentration and the solid angle under which the cell sees the sun is in fact only a minute fraction of a hemisphere, the maximum efficiency is not larger than 12.79%, which is actually lower than most recently fabricated solar cells. However, we can conclude that solar cell is a quantum converter and cannot be treated as a simple solar radiation converter [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…If we bear in mind that in a real situation the solar cell does not operate always in maximum concentration and the solid angle under which the cell sees the sun is in fact only a minute fraction of a hemisphere, the maximum efficiency is not larger than 12.79%, which is actually lower than most recently fabricated solar cells. However, we can conclude that solar cell is a quantum converter and cannot be treated as a simple solar radiation converter [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While the latter is indeed very expensive, it would appear that spectral splitting can be done at relatively low costs and, thus, is the approach to which MEG should be compared. If we recall that the ''photon splitting'' concept shows a 42% Shockley-Queisser limit for a (1.9+1.0 eV) two band gap solar cell [36,38] (and a higher one for more than 2 bandgaps), another factor should be considered. The problems that beset the ''photon splitting'' concept are rather well-known basic engineering and production ones [37].…”
Section: Multiple-exciton Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the radiative limit, n = 1 (per junction) and J0=2πqh3c2EgE2eE/kT1dE2πqk3h3c2T3(Enormalg/kT)2+2Enormalg/kT+2eEnormalg/kT2πqkh3c2TEnormalg2eEnormalg/kTwhere c is the speed of light and h is Planck's constant. (The approximation e E/kT >> 1 in the denominator of the integrand is accurate to better than one part in 10 8 for E g > 0.5 eV.)…”
Section: Analytic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%