2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-020-00567-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On symmetric fusion categories in positive characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
We prove that every finite symmetric integral tensor category C with the Chevalley property over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p > 2 admits a symmetric fiber functor to the category of supervector spaces. This proves Ostrik's conjecture [O, Conjecture 1.3] in this case. Equivalently, we prove that there exists a unique finite supergroup scheme G over k and a grouplike element ǫ ∈ kG of order ≤ 2, whose action by conjugation on G coincides with the parity automorphism of G, such that C is symmetric tensor equivalent to Rep(G, ǫ).
…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
We prove that every finite symmetric integral tensor category C with the Chevalley property over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p > 2 admits a symmetric fiber functor to the category of supervector spaces. This proves Ostrik's conjecture [O, Conjecture 1.3] in this case. Equivalently, we prove that there exists a unique finite supergroup scheme G over k and a grouplike element ǫ ∈ kG of order ≤ 2, whose action by conjugation on G coincides with the parity automorphism of G, such that C is symmetric tensor equivalent to Rep(G, ǫ).
…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…(1) The proof of Theorem 1.1 uses [O,Theorem 1.1] and [EOV,Theorem 8.1], and the method we use in the proof is motivated by Drinfeld's paper [D,Propositions 3.5,3.6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the matrix [c( 1 (1) The proof of (3) ⇒ (1) in Proposition 2.2 comes from the proof of [15,Proposition 2.9]. From this proof one is able to see that d C = ± det[a ij ], where a ij = Tr(X i X j ) for i, j ∈ I.…”
Section: Numerical Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to know when a fusion category over a field of positive characteristic is nondegenerate. Ostrik stated that a spherical fusion category C over a field k is nondegenerated, if the Grothendieck algebra Gr(C) ⊗ Z k is semisimple (see [15,Proposition 2.9]). It has been proved by Shimizu that a pivotal fusion category C over an algebraically closed field k is nondegenerate if and only if its Grothendieck algebra Gr(C) ⊗ Z k is semisimple (see [17,Theorem 6.5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure theory of tensor categories over fields of positive characteristic is in full development; see for instance [BE19, BEO20, Cou20, EG19, EO19, Ost20]. An important tool developed in [Cou20, EO19, Ost20] is the ‘Frobenius twist’ in arbitrary tensor categories. In [BE19] a family of tensor categories in characteristic 2 was constructed in which this functor is not exact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%