Abstract:In a series of 27 patients who required surgery for distal colonic lesions, primary bowel resection with immediate anastomosis after intraoperative antegrade colonic irrigation was performed. The technique of on-table lavage was similar to that described by Dudley and Radcliffe in 1980; however, some new technical details are introduced to minimize fecal contamination. There were 17 men and 10 women (mean age, 68.5 years). Twenty patients were admitted for obstructing carcinoma of the left colon; 11 underwent … Show more
“…The traditional treatment is a two-stage Hartmann procedure [15] . Single stage procedures have also been tried with reports of positive results in most cases [11,[16][17] . A subtotal colectomy and the standard bowel resection, after an on-table bowel preparation with antegrade colonic irrigation, are the two most popular procedures.…”
AIM:To evaluate the clinical significance of preand intra-operative colonoscopy for the detection of synchronous lesions in colon cancer.
METHODS:Two hundred and sixty-five pre-operative and 51 intra-operative colonoscopic evaluations were performed in 316 colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection from January 2001 to June 2006. The incidence and characteristics of synchronous lesions and their influence on surgery were evaluated.
RESULTS:Two hundred and eighty-two synchronous lesions were detected in 124 (39.2%) of 316 patients including all lesions regardless of their histologic type. True adenomatous polyps were found in 91 (28.8%) of 316 patients, and 17 (5.4% of all patients) patients had synchronous colon cancers. The preoperative identification of synchronous lesions altered the planned surgery in 37 (14.0%) of 265 patients. In 18 patients among the surgically removed cases, the lesions were removed by extending the resection range. Further segmental resection or polypectomy through enterotomy was necessary in 19 patients. Nineteen (37.2%) of 51 intraoperative colonoscopy cases had synchronous lesions. Additional surgical procedures including segmental bowel resection and polypectomy with enterotomy were necessary in 7 (13.7%) of 51 intraoperative colonoscopy cases to remove the lesions.
“…The traditional treatment is a two-stage Hartmann procedure [15] . Single stage procedures have also been tried with reports of positive results in most cases [11,[16][17] . A subtotal colectomy and the standard bowel resection, after an on-table bowel preparation with antegrade colonic irrigation, are the two most popular procedures.…”
AIM:To evaluate the clinical significance of preand intra-operative colonoscopy for the detection of synchronous lesions in colon cancer.
METHODS:Two hundred and sixty-five pre-operative and 51 intra-operative colonoscopic evaluations were performed in 316 colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection from January 2001 to June 2006. The incidence and characteristics of synchronous lesions and their influence on surgery were evaluated.
RESULTS:Two hundred and eighty-two synchronous lesions were detected in 124 (39.2%) of 316 patients including all lesions regardless of their histologic type. True adenomatous polyps were found in 91 (28.8%) of 316 patients, and 17 (5.4% of all patients) patients had synchronous colon cancers. The preoperative identification of synchronous lesions altered the planned surgery in 37 (14.0%) of 265 patients. In 18 patients among the surgically removed cases, the lesions were removed by extending the resection range. Further segmental resection or polypectomy through enterotomy was necessary in 19 patients. Nineteen (37.2%) of 51 intraoperative colonoscopy cases had synchronous lesions. Additional surgical procedures including segmental bowel resection and polypectomy with enterotomy were necessary in 7 (13.7%) of 51 intraoperative colonoscopy cases to remove the lesions.
“…A single-stage procedure for OLCC has been tried over the past 20 years with favorable results [10,[12][13][14]26]. Although some surgeons have reported favorable results from one-stage surgery for OLCC without bowel cleansing [21,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long term, it has the disadvantage of increasing the possibility of frequent bowel movements and incontinence [13,26]. The advantage of IACI over subtotal colectomy is that it prevents frequent bowel movements and incontinence [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not widely accepted, single-stage procedures have been tried by many institutions over the past 20 years with reports of positive results in most cases [10,[12][13][14]. Subtotal colectomy with ileocolic or ileorectal anastomosis and on-table bowel preparation with intraoperative antegrade clonic irrigation (IACI) and primary anastomosis are the two most described procedures.…”
The new device enabled safe, simple, and time-saving, single-stage surgical management of left colon cancer obstruction. The ability to perform on-table colonoscopy enabled treatment and recognition of synchronous bowel pathology.
“…Their method, a modification of the method described by Muir in 1968 [2], increased the chances of performing a safe colocolic anastomosis in patients with acute or sub-acute left-colonic obstruction. Since then, the details of the procedure have been unchanged, although slight modifications [3,4] as well as more extensive alterations [5] have been proposed. On-table lavage after the anastomosis is constructed has also been described [6].…”
When surgery is performed in patients with acute or sub-acute left-colonic obstruction, the method of antegrade on-table colonic lavage is well established. In this short note, a modification of the original procedure is presented that makes it even more uncomplicated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.