2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004113000637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On tamely ramified pro-p-extensions over -extensions of

Abstract: For an odd prime number p and a finite set S of prime numbers congruent to 1 modulo p, we consider the Galois group of the maximal pro-p-extension unramified outside S over the ${\mathbb Z}_p$-extension of the rational number field. In this paper, we classify all S such that the Galois group is a metacyclic pro-p group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore G S (k) is not p-adic analytic. Since [16,31,33]). Then G S (Q) is p-adic analytic, and actually there exists such S of cardinality |S| = 2 + δ p,2 .…”
Section: Relation Rank and Thementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore G S (k) is not p-adic analytic. Since [16,31,33]). Then G S (Q) is p-adic analytic, and actually there exists such S of cardinality |S| = 2 + δ p,2 .…”
Section: Relation Rank and Thementioning
confidence: 97%
“…All sets S with prometacyclic G S (Q cyc ) have been characterized arithmetically (cf. [16,31,33]). Then G S (Q) is p-adic analytic, and actually there exists such S of cardinality |S| = 2 + δ p,2 .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence by Proposition 4.5, if p q−1 p ≡ 1 (mod q) then X S (K) Z/p d Z for every Z pextension K/k. (See also, e.g., [13] for the case of the cyclotomic Z p -extension of Q.) REMARK 4.7.…”
Section: Sufficient Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For this subsection, see also [21], [24], [18], [14], [13], etc. Let K be a Z p -extension of an imaginary quadratic field k, and K n the nth layer of K/k for n ≥ 0 (recall that K 0 = k).…”
Section: Multiplicative Groups Of Residue Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. We use the result given in [17] (see also [9]). Let S = {q 1 , q 2 } be a set of distinct prime numbers satisfying the condition of [17,Theorem 1].…”
Section: Remark 43mentioning
confidence: 99%