1987
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/13/3/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On testing QCD predictions for R in e+e-annihilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A direct investigation of this problem by relating the pion-baryon phase shifts to the timelike form factor appears difficult, because the π-N S-matrix in the soliton formulation depends only on one variable. Earlier analyses of the form factors for timelike momentum transfers [3] are not helpful in this respect because the method of analytic continuation used there [16], provides only averaged form factors with an averaging interval that conceals all detailed structures. Unfortunately, even within this simple model the continuation into the timelike regime remains ill-posed; but it seems that obtaining the spectral functions as Laplace inverse of the spatial densities provides rather stable results in the most interesting region from threshold to about 2 m ̺ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct investigation of this problem by relating the pion-baryon phase shifts to the timelike form factor appears difficult, because the π-N S-matrix in the soliton formulation depends only on one variable. Earlier analyses of the form factors for timelike momentum transfers [3] are not helpful in this respect because the method of analytic continuation used there [16], provides only averaged form factors with an averaging interval that conceals all detailed structures. Unfortunately, even within this simple model the continuation into the timelike regime remains ill-posed; but it seems that obtaining the spectral functions as Laplace inverse of the spatial densities provides rather stable results in the most interesting region from threshold to about 2 m ̺ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to show that in order to construct an integral of motion in terms of the currents conserved in the bulk, there must be no momentum flowing through the boundary or at most the momentum evaluated at the boundary has to reduce to a total time-derivative term. At the classical level this analysis has been carried out for all Toda theories and it has been shown [9,10] that in general the higher-spin charges are conserved if the boundary perturbation is chosen appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if this is the case, an integral of motion is given by (n) . It has been shown [7,9,10] that the conditions in eq. (2.8) are satisfied if one restricts the class of boundary potentials to…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest cases, one is dealing with models in 1+1 dimensions, constructed in terms of fields which are free everywhere except for an interaction on the boundary. In spite of the remarkable progress achieved in handling these boundary interactions by means of conformal and/or integrable field theory [7][8][9][10][11][12], some interesting issues need a further investigation. One may wonder in this respect if the method of bosonization, another fundamental tool of two-dimensional quantum field theory, can shed new light on the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%