On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach.

Abstract

The "accuracy paradigm" for the study of personality judgment provides an important, new complement to the "error paradigm" that dominated this area of research for almost 2 decades. The present article introduces a specific approach within the accuracy paradigm called the Realistic Accuracy Model (RAM). RAM begins with the assumption that personality traits are real attributes of individuals. This assumption entails the use of a broad array of criteria for the evaluation of personality judgment and leads to a model that describes accuracy as a function of the availability, detection, and utilization of relevant behavioral cues. RAM provides a common explanation for basic moderators of accuracy, sheds light on how these moderators interact, and outlines a research agenda that includes the reintegration of the study of error with the study of accuracy.Believe truth! Shun error!-these, we see, are two materially different laws; and by choosing between them we may end by coloring differently our whole intellectual life. (James, 1897(James, /1915

Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text

“…Such a gold standard can be approximated by either observer or self-reports, however it is likely that for a specific trait one type of report will be closer to the true personality. A hypothesis that remains to be tested is that traits with a high visibility (e.g., extraversion) are more accurately assessed using observer reports, as they tend to yield a higher interjudge agreement (Funder, 1995), while low visibility traits (e.g., emotional stability) are better assessed by oneself. A personality recogniser aiming to estimate the true personality would therefore have to switch from observer models to self-report models, depending on the trait under assessment.…”

Recruiters’ Inferences of Applicant Personality Based on Resume Screening: Do Paper People have a Personality?

“…This research suggests that the ease of trait judgment and trait visibility is associated with self-other personality agreement (Funder and Colvin 1997;Hays and Dunning 1997). As defined by Funder (1995), ''good'' traits are those providing raters with frequent cues regarding the target's standing on the personality dimension. For example, Barrick et al (2000) found agreement was higher between self-ratings and interviewer-ratings on traits that were easier to judge because they were more observable in an interview (e.g., extraversion, openness to experience) compared to less visible, internal traits (e.g., neuroticism).…”

Living Together Apart: Perceived Concealment as a Signal of Exclusion in Marital Relationships

“…This result is not surprising given that people who keep secrets generally do their best to prevent others from finding out about the information they try to conceal. In this sense, concealment is not what Funder (1995) calls a good behavior. Concealment is a behavior that people avoid displaying overtly, that they try to disguise and actively prevent others from discovering.…”