2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mathematical model for the key components of high temperature nuclear reactor coupled with the advanced GT combined cycle is presented in tabs. 3 and 4 [23].…”
Section: Mathematical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mathematical model for the key components of high temperature nuclear reactor coupled with the advanced GT combined cycle is presented in tabs. 3 and 4 [23].…”
Section: Mathematical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angelino concluded that s-CO2 power cycle has the potential to perform better than reheat steam cycle on account of efficiency, simplicity and compactness [12]. Dekhtiarev [24] studied condensing reheated s-CO2 cycles as a good alternative to steam cycle for fossil fuel plant [25]. According to recent comprehensive reviews by Olumayegun et al [26], Ahn et al [19], Crespi et al [27] and Li et al [28], s-CO2 power cycles are currently being widely investigated as power conversion system for application in nuclear, fossil, concentrated solar power, biomass, and waste heat recovery systems because of its advantages [8,11,15,17,20,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of mixture of CO2 with additive gases to improve the performance of s-CO2 cycle of a nuclear reactor was investigated by Hu et al [17]. Even though s-CO2 cycle is usually viewed to provide superior thermodynamic performance than steam cycle only in the medium to high-temperature range (greater than 0 C), Santini et al [25] investigated the adoption of s-CO2 cycle for a far lower temperature (about 0 C) of an existing PWR. The results indicated that a reheated recompression s-CO2 cycle achieved a net cycle efficiency of about 34% compared to 33.5% of the existing steam cycle and the plant footprint was 10 times smaller than the steam cycle plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon dioxide as a working fluid is non-toxic, stable, and non-combustible [2]. A power block utilizing S-CO 2 has many benefits due to its compactness, low maintenance and running costs, and structural simplicity [6,7]. Another advantage which makes the utilization of CO 2 worthy in supercritical BC is the rapid change in its thermo-physical properties near its critical point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%