1992
DOI: 10.2307/2389522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Analysis of Size-Dependent Reproductive Output in Plants

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Functional Ecology. Summary 1. A general model is presented to analyse size-d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
3
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
116
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regression analysis indicated the following relationship : log e (inflorescence d. wt) lk13.86j3.5log e (vegetative d. wt) (R# l 0.80 ; n l 38). The slope was significantly steeper than 1, indicating that larger E. hirsutum plants invested relatively more biomass into sexual reproduction than did smaller plants (Klinkhamer et al, 1992).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regression analysis indicated the following relationship : log e (inflorescence d. wt) lk13.86j3.5log e (vegetative d. wt) (R# l 0.80 ; n l 38). The slope was significantly steeper than 1, indicating that larger E. hirsutum plants invested relatively more biomass into sexual reproduction than did smaller plants (Klinkhamer et al, 1992).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Confidence intervals were used to determine whether b was significantly different from 1, indicating that reproductive effort (R\V) either decreased (b 1), remained constant (b l 1) or increased (b 1) with plant size (Klinkhamer et al, 1992). If treatment effects in analysis of covariance were not significant, data from the different treatment levels were pooled before the precise relationships between vegetative plant dry weight and measures of reproductive output were investigated with linear regression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been recommended to model the relationship between reproduction and size due to 77 their simplicity and flexibility (Klinkhamer et al, 1992).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the general model of Klinkhamer et al (1992) to formulate the relationship between reproductive allocation and size or net production of the trees. The models are, wA = (~(P--/~)y, (Eq.…”
Section: Size-or Productivity-dependent Allocation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%