Different thermodynamics in phenolic blends with different polymeric modifiers, i.e.,
phenoxy, poly(decamethylene adipate), poly(ethylene oxide), and poly(vinyl alcohol), calculated by the
Painter and Coleman association model (PCAM) are examined. The thermodynamics is calculated based
upon the equilibrium constants derived experimentally from infrared spectroscopies of low molecular
weight analogues with similar hydrogen-bonding formation. The discrepancies between the PCAM
predictions and the experimentally observed T
g and free volume variation with blending composition are
attributed to the additional entropic effects introduced by the long repeated units of modifiers. The
structural characteristics and hydrogen-bonding heterogeneity as derived from solid-state NMR and IR
spectra support the notion that the length and size of the modifier repeated unit are responsible for such
discrepancies. These observed nonidealities can be interpreted as competition between inter- and
intraassociations (ΔH
m favored), which depend on the entropy rise associated with the amount of increase
of the breaking off of the self-association in phenolic and modifiers within blends. While PCAM is based
on “true” miscibility, however, minor modification is required to better describe the thermodynamics for
“real” blends where microdomain heterogeneity with size greater than that defined by thermodynamic
criteria may be present.