On the Attribution of Mercury’s Perihelion Precession

Qian, Weihong

doi:10.4236/jamp.2023.115088

Cited by 5 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…General relativity has implicit physical meaning in equations because it describes structures in the real world using geometric mathematics. Therefore, general relativity can describe Mercury precession more accurately than Newtonian gravity [41]. The mathematical form used by special relativity is a coordinate system transformation while its essence of illusory space time transformations is mathematically wonderful and a distortion of the physical world.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Physical Interpretation of Mass-Energy Equivalence Based on the Orthogonal Collision

Qian¹

2023

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Einstein described the mass-energy equivalence as the most important result of special relativity. But more than a century after Einstein first derived the relationship between mass-energy equivalence (or mass-energy equation), questions left for people are how to understand that mass and energy are somehow equivalent, and how to give the dynamical process for the conversion from mass to energy (or vice versa). This paper first interprets the formula of mass-energy equivalence published by Einstein in 1905, and then gives the equivalence relationship of mass-energy transition based on the dynamics of particle orthogonal collision. As a result, the orthogonal collision of two high-energy mass particles can generate a huge mass-energy density, equivalent to the total energy of N new particles, which is a one-way dynamic process that generates new mass-energy density and new matter. This conversion of mass into energy has nothing to do with special relativity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The presence of mass deforms space time, and the particle path curves towards the mass [40]. That is why in describing the precession of Mercury for that the general relativi-ty has achieved greater success than Newton's gravity [41]. General relativity is a development of Newton's theory of gravity.…”

Section: The Mathematical Meaning Of Mass-energy Equivalencementioning

confidence: 99%

A Physical Interpretation of Mass-Energy Equivalence Based on the Orthogonal Collision

Qian¹

2023

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, r is the radius of Mercury's revolution relative to the Sun. If K and m are not change with time (dK/dt = 0), we have [43],…”

Section: Mercury Precessionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Essence of Gravity Is the Expansion Tendency of the Universe after the Big Bang

Qian

2024

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Why cannot Newton's theory of gravitation be used to describe the motion of micro particles? This article summarizes and clarifies that Newton's theory of gravitation is subjectively a statistical description for natural phenomena, while its essence is the expansion tendency of particles in the new universe formed after the orthogonal collision (the Big Bang) of objects in the old universe. The new particles formed by the Big Bang exhibit the accelerating expansion and local convergence in the spacetime of the new universe. The force of the accelerating expansion for the new particles comes from the shear stress produced by the orthogonal collision. There is only a one-way conversion from the mass in the old universe to the energy in the new universe without any exchange of information between them. Orthogonal collision forms maximum energy density and accelerates motion of new particles. The theory that orthogonal collision produces a new universe can be used to explain the phenomena of three scales. On the cosmic scale, it can explain the Big Bang, the early celestial formation, and their movements. On the macro scale, it can explain the early Earth's surface mountain uplift and current atmospheric vortices. At the micro scale, it can explain aurora and other astronomical optical phenomena as well as the generation of new particles. The idea of orthogonal collision attempts to use shear stress and particle potential energy to find a theory of everything that can fully explain all aspects of the universe.

show abstract

“…In addition to the rotation of the Moon, there are other three-level motions: 1) an elliptical motion relative to the center of the Earth-Moon system (rotation around the Earth) and the precession caused by them, 2) an elliptic orbit around the Sun with the Earth and the precession caused by them, and 3) the movement of the Sun around the center of the Milky Way and the precession caused by them. The elliptical motion of the Moon relative to the Earth is characterized by the same as that of Mercury relative to the Sun [25]. In the multi-level environment of the Earth, the Sun and the Milky Way, the Moon's orbit also changes at different scales.…”

Section: Dynamics Of the Earth-moon System Formationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Equation (25) indicates that the Moon's orbit is an eccentric ellipse and not circular. From their formation process of planets and moons, the Moon does not orbit at the Earth's equatorial plane.…”

Section: Dynamics Of the Earth-moon System Formationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Tidal Theory Based on the Inertial Motion of the Matter in the Universe

Qian¹

2023

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Newton's theory of gravity has difficulties in attributing the explanation of the Earth's tidal phenomena. The reason is that Newton's gravitational law is statistically a mathematical form but not an essential description for the phenomena of matter motion in the universe. The current movement of matter in the universe is the inertia left over due to early collision history. The elliptical motion of planets relative to the Sun, the elliptical motion of the Moon relative to the Earth, the elliptical energy distribution of the Earth's oceanic and atmospheric fluids relative to the Earth's axis and their variations are all manifestations of inertial motion, which are legacy products of previous material interactions, particularly from an early orthogonal collision. This inertia tidal theory shows that the most obvious semidiurnal tide and the halfmonthly (spring-neap cycle) tide in oceans are oval distributions of fluid inertial motion energy relative to the Earth's axis, and the annual tide component is the inertial expression of the Earth's elliptical motion associated with the Sun's revolution. The tidal phenomena in Earth's fluids have nothing to do with gravity, but rather are an energetic manifestation of the inertial motion of fluids on a planetary scale.

show abstract

On the Attribution of Mercury’s Perihelion Precession

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

A Physical Interpretation of Mass-Energy Equivalence Based on the Orthogonal Collision

A Physical Interpretation of Mass-Energy Equivalence Based on the Orthogonal Collision

The Essence of Gravity Is the Expansion Tendency of the Universe after the Big Bang

A Tidal Theory Based on the Inertial Motion of the Matter in the Universe

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About