2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2012.6287824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the automatic identification of difficult examples for beat tracking: Towards building new evaluation datasets

Abstract: In this paper, an approach is presented that identifies music samples which are difficult for current state-of-the-art beat trackers. In order to estimate this difficulty even for examples without ground truth, a method motivated by selective sampling is applied. This method assigns a degree of difficulty to a sample based on the mutual disagreement between the output of various beat tracking systems. On a large beat annotated dataset we show that this mutual agreement is correlated with the mean performance o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mean Mutual Agreement (MMA) is computed by measuring the mean of all mutual agreements between all estimated beat tracker outputs . In [32] the properties of existing beat tracking evaluation measures [33] were reviewed for the purpose of measuring mutual agreement. Of these, the Information Gain approach [34] (InfGain) was shown to have a true zero value able to match low MMA (measured in bits) with unrelated beat sequences.…”
Section: Selection Methods and Measuring Mutual Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mean Mutual Agreement (MMA) is computed by measuring the mean of all mutual agreements between all estimated beat tracker outputs . In [32] the properties of existing beat tracking evaluation measures [33] were reviewed for the purpose of measuring mutual agreement. Of these, the Information Gain approach [34] (InfGain) was shown to have a true zero value able to match low MMA (measured in bits) with unrelated beat sequences.…”
Section: Selection Methods and Measuring Mutual Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to Gouyon [84] for a review on rhythm description systems. Holzapfel et al [104] perform a comparative evaluation of beat tracking algorithms, finding that the main limitations of existing systems are to deal with non-percussive material (e.g., vocal music) with soft onsets, and to handle short-time deviations, varying tempo, and integrating knowledge on tempo perception (double or half errors) [171].…”
Section: Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When assuming a steady beat and a single global tempo, many automated methods yield accurate tempo estimates and beat tracking results [10,11]. However, the task becomes much more difficult when one deals with music with weak note onsets and local tempo changes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the task becomes much more difficult when one deals with music with weak note onsets and local tempo changes [6]. A discussion of difficult examples for beat tracking can also be found in [12,11]. Instead of extracting tempo and beat information explicitly, various spectrogram-like representations have been proposed for visualizing tempo-related information over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%