2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the behaviour of the magnesium alloy, AZ61 to one-dimensional shock loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the vast number of GB types and grain characteristics, it is highly desirable to investigate some elemental processes, such as columnar crystals or bicrystals, so we can grain certain specific insights without being overwhelmed by the complexities of abundant random GBs. In addition, due to the highly transient nature of shock events, it is extremely challenging to acquire the real-time measurements of microstructure responses [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In contrast, MD simulations are capable of supplying real-time data for understanding dynamic materials physics/mechanics of a wide range of materials/microstructures at atomic scales, including single crystals, nanocrystalline metals, glasses, polymers, and composites [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the vast number of GB types and grain characteristics, it is highly desirable to investigate some elemental processes, such as columnar crystals or bicrystals, so we can grain certain specific insights without being overwhelmed by the complexities of abundant random GBs. In addition, due to the highly transient nature of shock events, it is extremely challenging to acquire the real-time measurements of microstructure responses [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In contrast, MD simulations are capable of supplying real-time data for understanding dynamic materials physics/mechanics of a wide range of materials/microstructures at atomic scales, including single crystals, nanocrystalline metals, glasses, polymers, and composites [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9]. Shock experiments [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have been routinely performed on polycrystalline solids along with very limited molecular dynamic (MD) simulations in past few decades [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Given the vast number of GB types and grain characteristics, it is highly desirable to investigate some elemental processes, such as columnar crystals or bicrystals, so we can grain certain specific insights without being overwhelmed by the complexities of abundant random GBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Evidence of precursor decay has been seen in AZ61 [3], however, for the T5 alloy this was not the case. This behavior is tentatively attributed to the nature of the precipitation-hardening heat treatment that hinders dislocation nucleation and mobility (the principal mechanism by which precursor decay would be expected to occur).…”
Section: Hugoniot Elastic Limitmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The gauge results revealed that the T5 alloy had a HEL of 0.38 ± 0.02 GPa, considerably higher than that of AZ61 [3]. However unlike AZ61, where tentative evidence of precursor decay was found with increasing target thickness, the T5-alloy's HEL did not decay.…”
Section: Hugoniot Elastic Limitmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, from equation 2, it can be seen that shear strength can also be measured using suitably orientated manganin stress gauges. This methodology has been used by ourselves and others on a variety of materials including metals and alloys [10][11][12], ceramics and silicate glasses [13][14][15] and polymers [16][17][18]. It can be seen that this is an invasive procedure, in that a manganin stress gauge must be introduced into a sectioned target assembly, and as such, it has been suggested that in doing so, the lateral stress recorded by the gauge is more a function of the layer of adhesive it sits in due to target assembly [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%