2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00025-016-0628-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Bohnenblust–Hille Inequality for Multilinear Forms

Abstract: The general versions of the Bohnenblust-Hille inequality for m-linear forms are valid for exponents q 1 , ..., q m ∈ [1, 2]. In this paper we show that a slightly different characterization is valid for q 1 , ..., q m ∈ (0, ∞).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most for reaching generalizations of the Hardy-Littlewood inequality is the following theorem (see also [25]): Theorem 1.1. (See Albuquerque, Araujo, Núñez, Pellegrino and Rueda [1]) Let m ≥ 2 be a positive integer, 1 ≤ k ≤ m and n 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most for reaching generalizations of the Hardy-Littlewood inequality is the following theorem (see also [25]): Theorem 1.1. (See Albuquerque, Araujo, Núñez, Pellegrino and Rueda [1]) Let m ≥ 2 be a positive integer, 1 ≤ k ≤ m and n 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for the optimal constants involved in Bohnenblust-Hille and Hardy-Littlewood inequalities was efficiently developed in the recent years and the best known constant have polynomial growth (see [10,15,16,18]). Kahane-Salem-Zygmund's inequality turns out to be a formidable (but not complete) tool to provide the optimal exponents on both inequalities (see [1,4,20]). Therefore, a question arises: "How efficient the Kahane-Salem-Zygmund is on providing optimal Bohnenblust-Hille or Hardy-Littlewood constants?…”
Section: Final Remark: Constants With Exponential Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above estimate appears is essence in Bayart's paper [2]. Both the multilinear and polynomial versions of the Kahane-Salem-Zygmund inequalities play a fundamental role in modern Analysis (see, for instance, [3,5,9] and the references therein). However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, despite the existence of more involved abstract generalizations of the Kahane-Salem-Zygmund inequality (see [8]), the best estimate (i.e., the smallest possible exponent for n) for the general case (p 1 , ..., p m ∈ [1, ∞]) of sequence spaces is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%