Proceedings of the 38th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2465506.2465938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the boolean complexity of real root refinement

Abstract: We assume that a real square-free polynomial A has a degree d, a maximum coefficient bitsize τ and a real root lying in an isolating interval and having no nonreal roots nearby (we quantify this assumption). Then, we combine the Double Exponential Sieve algorithm (also called the Bisection of the Exponents), the bisection, and Newton iteration to decrease the width of this inclusion interval by a factor of t = 2 −L . The algorithm has Boolean complexity OB(d 2 τ + dL). Our algorithms support the same complexit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are confident, however, that also other hybrid methods can be modified in a way to yield comparable complexity bounds. For polynomials with integer coefficients, a recently proposed method [35,36] combines Newton iteration and bisection, achieving similar complexity bounds. In comparison to our approach, their method requires the initial isolating interval I = (a, b) to be small enough such that, except for the isolated root, there is no other (real or non-real) root of f with a distance less than (1 + ε) · b−a 2 to the center mid(I) of I, where (1 + ε) n > 2 for some n = O(log d).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are confident, however, that also other hybrid methods can be modified in a way to yield comparable complexity bounds. For polynomials with integer coefficients, a recently proposed method [35,36] combines Newton iteration and bisection, achieving similar complexity bounds. In comparison to our approach, their method requires the initial isolating interval I = (a, b) to be small enough such that, except for the isolated root, there is no other (real or non-real) root of f with a distance less than (1 + ε) · b−a 2 to the center mid(I) of I, where (1 + ε) n > 2 for some n = O(log d).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of approximating one root of A up to a desired precision is the same as the cost of approximating all the roots [31,33]. It is O B (m 2 n(σ + τ )).…”
Section: An Application: Solving All the Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By lg(·) we denote the logarithm with base 2. To estimate the Boolean complexity of the algorithms supported by Corollaries 5 and 6 we apply some results from Pan and Tsigaridas (2013) [26] and Pan and Tsigaridas (2015) [27], which hold in the general case where the coefficients of the polynomials are known up to an arbitrary precision. In this section we assume that the polynomial p = p(x) has Gaussian (that is, complex integer) coefficients known exactly; the parameter λ, to be specified in the sequel, should be considered as the working precision.…”
Section: Boolean Cost Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%