1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf02138664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the brain of the Amazon dolphinInia geoffrensis de Blainville 1817 (Cetacea, Susuidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

1974
1974
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The differentiation of the Bolivia group from all other Astronotus is potentially explained by the presence of the series of rapids on the Madeira River. These series of rapids are thought to delimit the geographic distributions of such diverse taxa as Inia geoffrensis and I. boliviensis [48, 49], Cichla monoculus and C. pleiozona [50], or they act as barriers, restricting gene flow in Colossoma macropomum [13] and Podocnemis expansa [51]. The physiochemical composition of the Negro River has also been suggested to act as a barrier between and within species [16, 17, 52, 53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differentiation of the Bolivia group from all other Astronotus is potentially explained by the presence of the series of rapids on the Madeira River. These series of rapids are thought to delimit the geographic distributions of such diverse taxa as Inia geoffrensis and I. boliviensis [48, 49], Cichla monoculus and C. pleiozona [50], or they act as barriers, restricting gene flow in Colossoma macropomum [13] and Podocnemis expansa [51]. The physiochemical composition of the Negro River has also been suggested to act as a barrier between and within species [16, 17, 52, 53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtual cranial endocast of Prospaniomys was compared with natural and virtual caviomorph endocasts from the literature (Pilleri et al, 1984; Dozo, 1997a, b; Dozo et al, 2004; Madozzo-Jaén, 2019; Ferreira et al, 2020, 2021; Fig. 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All graphs were obtained using the free software PAST v4.10 (Hammer et al, 2001).
Figure 6.Boxplots showing the following comparisons: ( 1 ) olfactory bulbs volume with respect to total endocast volumes of Prospaniomys , the fossil cavioid Neoreomys , extant caviomorphs, and noncaviomorph rodents; ( 2 ) neocortical surface with respect to total endocast surfaces of Prospaniomys , extant caviomorphs, and Paleogene noncaviomorph rodents; ( 3 ) paraflocculi volume with respect to total volumes of endocasts of Prospaniomys and Paleogene noncaviomorph rodents.
Figure 7.Regression plots of ( 1 ) log 10 (olfactory bulbs volume, in mm 3 ) versus log 10 (endocranial volume, in mm 3 ); ( 2 ) log 10 (olfactory bulbs mass, in g) versus log 10 (body mass, in g); ( 3 ) log 10 (neocortical surface, in mm 2 ) versus log 10 (endocranial surface, in mm 2 ); ( 4 ) log 10 (paraflocculi volume, in mm 3 ) versus log 10 (endocranial volume, in mm 3 ); ( 5 ) log 10 (paraflocculi mass, in g) versus log 10 (body mass, in g).
Figure 8.( 1–3 ) Encephalization quotients of Prospaniomys , the fossil cavioid Neoreomys , the fossil chinchilloid Neoepiblema , extant caviomorphs ( Phyllomys , Myocastor , Capromys , Cavia , Dolichotis , Dinomys , and Lagostomus ), and fossil noncaviomorph rodents ( Paramys , Ischyromys , Cedromus , Pseudotomus , and Rapamys ): ( 1 ) based on Jerison's (1973) equation; ( 2 ) based on Eisenberg's (1981) equation; ( 3 ) based on Pilleri et al's (1984) equation; ( 4 ) regression plot of log 10 (endocranial mass, in g) versus log 10 (body mass, in g). 1 = Prospaniomys priscus ; 2 = Phyllomys dasythrix Hensel, 1872; 3 and 4 = Myocastor coypus Kerr, 1792; 5 = Capromys pilorides (Say, 1822); 6 and 7 = Coendou spinosus Cuvier, 1823a; 8 = Erethizon dorsatum (Linnaeus, 1758); 9 = Neoreomys australis Ameghino, 1887; 10 = Dolicavia minuscula Ameghino, 1908; 11 = Cavia sp.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations