2013 Third International Conference on Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iccitechnology.2013.6579589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the capacity and spatial fairness trade-off in planning sectorization and frequency reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We place F, S and R in GP group and  in FTP group. This grouping is quite intuitive and also can be inferred from the expressions in (5) and (6) that show that F, S and R have more profound impact on the SINR and hence the KPIs associated with it, than  .…”
Section: A Case Study For Cpsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We place F, S and R in GP group and  in FTP group. This grouping is quite intuitive and also can be inferred from the expressions in (5) and (6) that show that F, S and R have more profound impact on the SINR and hence the KPIs associated with it, than  .…”
Section: A Case Study For Cpsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…LTE) is fixed, so the throughput on single sub-carrier in a given BS-user link and hence the total throughput of the system depends on average achievable modulation coding efficiency (MCE) on each link in the system. Over the long term, the MCE in turn depends on SINR available on that link, whose longterm average value (in full load scenario as assumed previously) in turn depends mainly on NTC as derived in (5) and (6).…”
Section: Quantifying ‡ : Reflecting Capacity-wise Performance From Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations