1970
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.43.567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Charge Distribution of the Pion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well fitted as ρ(0, r) ≃ 20r −2.08 . The power law distribution ∝ r −2 is seen in a course of collapse of the isothermal rotating cloud (Norman et al 1980;Narita et al 1984) as well as the isothermal spherical collapse (Larson 1969;Penston 1969). The disk is divided into two parts: a core which shows ρ(0, r) ≃constant and an envelope which shows ρ ∝ r −2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well fitted as ρ(0, r) ≃ 20r −2.08 . The power law distribution ∝ r −2 is seen in a course of collapse of the isothermal rotating cloud (Norman et al 1980;Narita et al 1984) as well as the isothermal spherical collapse (Larson 1969;Penston 1969). The disk is divided into two parts: a core which shows ρ(0, r) ≃constant and an envelope which shows ρ ∝ r −2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 5d, it is shown that the core size, r c , which is defined as the region where σ ≃ constant, decreases with time and the column density in the core σ c is proportional to 1/r c , that is, σ c × r c ≃ constant. This is seen in a course of "run-away collapse" in rotating isothermal clouds (Norman et al 1980;Narita et al 1984). In the runaway collapse, the density in a small part of the cloud increases infinitely, even the centrifugal force prevents the cloud from global contraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a property of the self-similar collapse, and occurs in a rotating, magnetic disk (BM95a; Basu 1997), where efficient magnetic braking prior to collapse keeps the centrifugal support at very low levels anyway. This effect is also present in non-magnetic rotating disks (Norman et al 1980;Narita, Hayashi, & Miyama 1984;Hayashi 1987), where the centrifugal support is much greater but also cannot grow and thereby halt the collapse. After a central protostar is formed (t > 0), the collapse becomes even more dynamic in an inner region where the infall resembles free-fall onto a central point mass, e.g., the similarity solutions of Shu (1977) and Hunter (1977).…”
Section: The Centrifugal Radiusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dynamical evolution of supercritical cores after their formation has been studied by many researchers. Solutions exist for the collapse of nonrotating, self-gravitating spheres without thermal support (Henriksen 1994), self-gravitating spheres with thermal support (Penston 1969;Larson 1969;Shu 1977;Hunter 1977;Boss & Black 1982;Whitworth & Summers 1985;Foster & Chevalier 1993) as well as with a combined thermal and isotropic magnetic pressure support (Chiueh & Chou 1994), and self-gravitating disks with thermal support (Narita, Hayashi, & Miyama 1984;Matsumoto, Hanawa, & Nakamura 1997) and also with ordered, frozen-in magnetic fields (Nakamura, Hanawa & Nakano 1995;Li & Shu 1997, hereafter LS). In order to choose a particular solution for a given problem, one needs to know the properties of the supercritical core at the time of its formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%