2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00037-003-0179-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the complexity of vertex-disjoint length-restricted path problems

Abstract: Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph and s and t be two distinct vertices of G. A path in G is called -bounded for some ∈ N if it does not contain more than edges. We prove that computing the maximum number of vertex-disjoint -bounded s, t-paths is APXcomplete for any ≥ 5. This implies that the problem of finding k vertex-disjoint -bounded s, t-paths with minimal total weight for a given number k ∈ N, 1 ≤ k ≤ |V | − 1, and nonnegative weights on the edges of G is N PO-complete for any length bound ≥ 5. Furthermore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guruswami et al [2003] show that the edge-disjoint 6-length-bounded s-t-paths problem is MAX SN P-hard, and for any length-bound they give an O( √ m)-approximation algorithm, where m denotes the number of edges. Bley [2003] proves that both the node-and the edge-disjoint maximum 5-length-bounded s-t-paths problem are APX -complete. For directed networks, Guruswami et al [2003] show that the problem is N P-hard to approximate within a factor of n 1 2 −ǫ , for any ǫ > 0; n denotes the number of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Guruswami et al [2003] show that the edge-disjoint 6-length-bounded s-t-paths problem is MAX SN P-hard, and for any length-bound they give an O( √ m)-approximation algorithm, where m denotes the number of edges. Bley [2003] proves that both the node-and the edge-disjoint maximum 5-length-bounded s-t-paths problem are APX -complete. For directed networks, Guruswami et al [2003] show that the problem is N P-hard to approximate within a factor of n 1 2 −ǫ , for any ǫ > 0; n denotes the number of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If failures are expected to occur only sporadically (and in case of 1 : 1 protection), then it may be desirable to minimize the weight of the primary (shorter) path (min-min objective), which also leads to an NP-hard problem [109]. The min-max and minmin disjoint paths problems could be considered as extreme cases of the bounded disjoint paths problem, which was shown to be NP-hard [110] and later proven to be APX-hard by Bley [111] (the graph structure referred to as lobe that was used by Itai et al [110] to prove NP-completeness has since often been used to prove that other disjoint paths problems are NP-complete, e.g., [112][113][114]). Finding widest disjoint paths can easily be done by pruning "low-capacity" links from the graph and finding disjoint paths.…”
Section: Min-min Disjoint Paths Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLBDP problem was proven to be NP-complete for b ≥ 5 by Itai et al in [13] and later proven to be APX-hard 2 for b ≥ 5 by Bley in [3].…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%