2011
DOI: 10.1002/prop.201000093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the computation of non‐perturbative effective potentials in the string theory landscape – IIB/F‐theory perspective –

Abstract: Abstract:We discuss a number of issues arising when computing non-perturbative effects systematically across the string theory landscape. In particular, we cast the study of fairly generic physical properties into the language of computability/number theory and show that this amounts to solving systems of diophantine equations. In analogy to the negative solution to Hilbert's 10th problem, we argue that in such systematic studies there may be no algorithm by which one can determine all physical effects. We tak… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(290 reference statements)
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This setup appears naturally in the A N −1 case, where the resulting N = 4 theories with duality defects are useful for understanding aspects of the physics of euclidean D3-branes in F-theory language [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. There is no known corresponding notion of an "exceptional instanton", but the abstract study of the generalization of such duality defects to exceptional theories should be interesting in any case, and the non-geometric backgrounds described in this note give one way of explicitly constructing such setups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This setup appears naturally in the A N −1 case, where the resulting N = 4 theories with duality defects are useful for understanding aspects of the physics of euclidean D3-branes in F-theory language [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. There is no known corresponding notion of an "exceptional instanton", but the abstract study of the generalization of such duality defects to exceptional theories should be interesting in any case, and the non-geometric backgrounds described in this note give one way of explicitly constructing such setups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In fact, in 1986 it was already anticipated [6] that there are over 10 1500 consistent chiral heterotic compactifications. As examples of complexity, finding small cosmological constants in the Bousso-Polchinski model is NP-complete [7], constructing scalar potentials in string theory and finding minima are both computationally hard [8], and the diversity of Diophantine equations that arise in string theory (for instance, in index calculations) raises the issue of undecidability in the landscape [9] by analogy to the negative solution to Hilbert's 10 th problem. Finally, in addition to difficulties posed by size and complexity, there are also critical formal issues related to the lack of a complete definition of string theory and M-theory.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dynamical vacuum selection [8] on a network of string geometries [9] in a well-studied bubble cosmology [10] selects models with large numbers of gauge groups and axions, as well as strong coupling. However, concrete studies of the landscape are difficult due to its enormity [11,12,13,14,9,15], computational complexity [16,17,18,19,20], and undecidability [17]. It is therefore natural to expect that, in addition to the formal progress that is clearly required, data science techniques such as supervised machine learning will be necessary to understand the landscape; see for initial works [21,22,8,23] in this directions and [24,25,26,27,28,29,30] for additional promising results.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%