2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the construct validity of interoceptive accuracy based on heartbeat counting: Cardiovascular determinants of absolute and tilt-induced change scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the construct validity of interoceptive accuracy was low in the present study ( Schulz et al, 2021 ). Future studies should confirm the findings of the present study using a novel interoceptive task with more validity ( Garfinkel et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the construct validity of interoceptive accuracy was low in the present study ( Schulz et al, 2021 ). Future studies should confirm the findings of the present study using a novel interoceptive task with more validity ( Garfinkel et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Although this task has been used frequently in existing literature, its validity has been questioned due to the possibility of participants estimating their heartbeat using existing knowledge of their heart rate and thus confounding their time estimation ability ( Desmedt et al, 2018 , 2020 ). To address this possibility, we explicitly instructed participants to avoid using heart rate knowledge to lessen the confounding effects of non-interoceptive strategies ( Desmedt et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Schulz et al, 2021 ). We also calculated the correlation between the number of counted heartbeats and the estimated duration in the temporal ability task to determine whether participants used their ability of time perception in the HCT ( Desmedt et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, right insula damage decreases interoceptive accuracy as measures with the HCT (Ronchi et al, 2015). Lastly, performance in the heartbeat discrimination task has been recently found to represent the strongest, most stable predictor of performance in the HCT (Schulz et al, 2021;but see Hickman et al, 2020). Thus, while no single interoceptive measure is free of confounds, given the online implementation of our study and the aforementioned evidence, we believe that performance in HCT does reflect at least some interoceptive related processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These tasks have distinct psychophysiological properties; hence, their combination enhances inferential power (A. Schulz et al, 2021) and both were used previously in context of interoception and music (Hina et al, 2020;Schirmer-Mokwa et al, 2015).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy score equalled 1/6 ∑ [1 − (|nbeats real − nbeats reported|)/((nbeats real + nbeats reported)/2)] (Hart et al, 2013). Notably, performance in the HB tracking task can potentially be affected by various factors, including knowledge of one's heart rate or counting seconds instead of heartbeats; thus, its validity has recently been criticized (e.g., (Desmedt et al, 2020;Ring & Brener, 2018) but see (Ainley et al, 2020;A. Schulz et al, 2021) for further discussion).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%