2003
DOI: 10.4064/aa108-1-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the correlation of the truncated Liouville function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for ε ∈ (0, 1) and x ≥ x 0 (ε). This result may be compared with that of Daboussi and Sárkőzy [3] and Mangerel [21], which states that if we define λ <y (n) as the completely multiplicative function taking the value −1 at the primes p < y and +1 at the primes p ≥ y (so that λ <y (p) has the opposite sign as λ >y (p)), then 1 x n≤x λ <x ε (n)λ <x ε (n + 1) = o ε→0 (1); (1.6) moreover, they proved this in a quantitative form. The proof of (1.6) is based on sieve theory and is very different from the proof of (1.5).…”
Section: Applications Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…for ε ∈ (0, 1) and x ≥ x 0 (ε). This result may be compared with that of Daboussi and Sárkőzy [3] and Mangerel [21], which states that if we define λ <y (n) as the completely multiplicative function taking the value −1 at the primes p < y and +1 at the primes p ≥ y (so that λ <y (p) has the opposite sign as λ >y (p)), then 1 x n≤x λ <x ε (n)λ <x ε (n + 1) = o ε→0 (1); (1.6) moreover, they proved this in a quantitative form. The proof of (1.6) is based on sieve theory and is very different from the proof of (1.5).…”
Section: Applications Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We are, unfortunately, unable to establish. 2 This nevertheless, the techniques used to prove Corollary 1•3 above are sufficient to establish the following weak versions of the binary Chowla conjecture 3 . THEOREM 1•6.…”
Section: Conjecture 1•5 (Chowlamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a particular case, they show that n≤x µ y (n)µ y (n + 1) ≪ x 1 (log y) 9 + e − β Their result is not explicitly stated for shifts a other than 1, though this restriction appears to be merely technical. We emphasize, though, that our probabilistic view of the problem motivates the methods that we employ in this paper, and these are substantially different from those used in [3]. Among other things, in [3] Brun's sieve is used, while in the present paper we appeal to the Rosser-Iwaniec sieve instead (see Lemma 2.4 below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations