2020
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-20-0338.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Correspondence between Seasonal Forecast Biases and Long-Term Climate Biases in Sea Surface Temperature

Abstract: The correspondence between mean sea surface temperature (SST) biases in retrospective seasonal forecasts (hindcasts) and long-term climate simulations from five global climate models is examined to diagnose the degree to which systematic SST biases develop on seasonal time scales. The hindcasts are from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble and the climate simulations are from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. The analysis suggests that most robust climatological SST biases begin to form within 6 mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite numerous advances and constant development of climate modeling, errors are intrinsic to the process. However, several studies point to different causes for the deviations, such as deficiency in SST simulation, errors in the initialization of soil moisture conditions, and inappropriate physical parameterization [3,[34][35][36]78]. In addition, improved extreme events prediction requires a deep understanding of drought and flood mechanisms, refined observations from data assimilation, better parameterizing techniques, efficient ensemble methodologies, and proper uncertainty quantification [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite numerous advances and constant development of climate modeling, errors are intrinsic to the process. However, several studies point to different causes for the deviations, such as deficiency in SST simulation, errors in the initialization of soil moisture conditions, and inappropriate physical parameterization [3,[34][35][36]78]. In addition, improved extreme events prediction requires a deep understanding of drought and flood mechanisms, refined observations from data assimilation, better parameterizing techniques, efficient ensemble methodologies, and proper uncertainty quantification [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CanSIPSv2 model, the best among the three NMME models, shows moderate skills for the lead time less than eight months, with correlation ~ 0.40, MAPE ~ 25%, and HSS > 40%. The lower prediction skills of the NMME models at longer lead times are probably linked to initial conditions for these lead times and model drifts (e.g., Hermanson et al 2018;Manzanas 2020;Ma et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8a), consistent with typical prediction skills of dynamic models when lead time is longer (e.g., Yang 2014, Zhao et al 2015). Such low skills at long lead times may be associated with (1) initial conditions for these lead times (as initial conditions are responsible for the initial bias growth; Ma et al 2021) and (2) model drifts (e.g., asymptotic, overshooting, and inverse drift; Hermanson et al 2018;Manzanas 2020). The CanSIPSv2 shows the best performance among the three models, and the prediction skill of the correlation is comparable to that of the ANN with the retrospective approach for LD1-LD5.…”
Section: Prediction Skills Of Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional studies have related biases that develop following initialization to those in long-term simulations unconstrained by initialization (Hermanson et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2014Ma et al, , 2020 and inconsistencies between sea ice and ocean initial conditions (Cruz-García et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%