2016 American Control Conference (ACC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2016.7525290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the definiteness of graph Laplacians with negative weights: Geometrical and passivity-based approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollary 1 is consistent with the statements in [12,Theorem III.4] and [13,Theorem 3.2]. Example 2:…”
Section: B Semidefiniteness and Conductance Matrixsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Corollary 1 is consistent with the statements in [12,Theorem III.4] and [13,Theorem 3.2]. Example 2:…”
Section: B Semidefiniteness and Conductance Matrixsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Remark 5: Theorem 6 gives two necessary and sufficient conditions for L G being PSD with only one zero eigenvalue. It generalizes the results in [20][21][22] that apply to those graphs with a special location distribution of negative weighted edges. Note that the sequential inclusion describes an expansion from a single node to the whole concerned set (V k+1 − \V k − refers to the node to be included in one step).…”
Section: Interpreting Graph Laplacian Definiteness By Effective Rsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…By (6c) and (6d), the first term of right-hand-side of (27) is zero, and the second term is r eff (L G , V a , V b ). Therefore, r eff (L G , V a , V b ) is the optimal value of problem (22) as well as the original problem in (9). Moreover, we have r eff (L G , V a , V b ) > 0 since the objective v T L G v is nonnegative and the only case that makes it zero (v = 1 n ) is excluded by (22b).…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 4: Formentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It was shown that the absolute value of the negative edge weight must be larger than the inverse of the effective resistance between the two nodes connected by the edge. The same result was rederived in [10], where two alternative proofs were provided based on geometrical and passivitybased approaches. The definiteness of the signed Laplacian matrix for the signed directed networks has also been studied in [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%