2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the design methodology of scarf repairs to composite laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on composite scarf joints or repairs were employed by many researchers [29][30][31][32][33]. However, a scarf joint in a composite structure is more complex because, unlike lap or stepped-lap joints, the stiffness of the bonded surface varies along the bondline.…”
Section: Effect Of Joint Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on composite scarf joints or repairs were employed by many researchers [29][30][31][32][33]. However, a scarf joint in a composite structure is more complex because, unlike lap or stepped-lap joints, the stiffness of the bonded surface varies along the bondline.…”
Section: Effect Of Joint Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of the optimization of stresses is a higher strength for the same bond area than strap repairs [24], which renders scarf repairs more suited to critical applications [25]. The substantial or full strength recovery achieved by this method, provided that the repair is correctly designed, usually makes scarf repairs as permanent [26][27][28][29]. Conversely to strap techniques, scarf repairs are also flush with the damaged structure, which is an important advantage since aerodynamic disturbance is prevented and stealth characteristics (if relevant) are not compromised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they require a large repair area, since relatively small angles are necessary to restore the strength of components [27,29,31]. The execution of this repair initiates by machining a tapered cavity to remove the damaged material and to provide the repair geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-uniformity of the stresses along the scarf bondline shown in Figure 3 would result in severe load-carrying penalties even for ductile adhesives, because the average shear stress in a composite repair remains below the adhesive's yield strength [4]. Therefore, it is possible to achieve higher joint strength by optimising the scarf shape so that the stress concentration is minimised.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Optimisation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simplification significantly reduced the modelling and computational effort required. Although this simplification is known to influence the local stress state within the adhesive bondline, the influence is well documented and understood [1][2][3][4], making it relatively easy to transfer any design implications to the more complex scenario of a composite laminate. The boundary conditions, loads and material are such that the model symmetry can be exploited to further reduce the computational effort.…”
Section: Computational Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%