2019
DOI: 10.3390/met9030371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Design of Innovative Heterogeneous Sheet Metal Tests Using a Shape Optimization Approach

Abstract: The development of full-field measurement methods has enabled a new trend of heterogeneous mechanical tests. The inhomogeneous strain fields retrieved from these tests are being widely used in the calibration of constitutive models for sheet metals. However, today, there is no mechanical test able to characterize the material in a large range of strain states. The aim of this work is to present a heterogeneous mechanical test with an innovative tool/specimen shape, capable of producing rich heterogeneous strai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to minimize the cost function that provides the optimum heterogeneous specimen shape for a uniaxial tensile test, based on the indicator developed by Souto et al, [ 98 ] Andrade‐Campos et al investigated the best curve parameterization and optimization algorithm. [ 99 ] Seven optimization strategies were used, but only four of them were able to converge to a solution: the Nelder–Mead, pattern search, SDBOX (globally‐convergent derivative‐free algorithm for the minimization of a continuously differentiable function), and CMA‐ES (covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy). The number of control points that minimizes the cost function regarding the different curve parameterization was also determined.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Tests Coupled With Inverse Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize the cost function that provides the optimum heterogeneous specimen shape for a uniaxial tensile test, based on the indicator developed by Souto et al, [ 98 ] Andrade‐Campos et al investigated the best curve parameterization and optimization algorithm. [ 99 ] Seven optimization strategies were used, but only four of them were able to converge to a solution: the Nelder–Mead, pattern search, SDBOX (globally‐convergent derivative‐free algorithm for the minimization of a continuously differentiable function), and CMA‐ES (covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy). The number of control points that minimizes the cost function regarding the different curve parameterization was also determined.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Tests Coupled With Inverse Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information was relevant to enhance finite element analysis by considering both real geometry and boundary conditions, in contrast with prescribing idealised displacements at the boundary domain [ 34 , 35 ]. Full-field data were conveniently used in other studies for advanced inverse material characterisation, particularly dealing with heterogeneous stress and strain states that can be generated by geometric discontinuities, loading configurations or material structure [ 16 , 32 , 36 ]. In situ DIC measurements have also been playing an important role in fracture and fatigue problems.…”
Section: In Situ Monitoring Using Full-field Measurement Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of a mechanical test based on the empirical knowledge of the authors was addressed in [1][2][3], for example. The strain field heterogeneity was used as a criterion to lead the design process using optimization methodologies [4][5][6][7]. A step further relies on evaluating the uncertainty of the identified parameters [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%