2006
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Dirichlet problem for non-totally degenerate fully nonlinear elliptic equations

Abstract: We prove some comparison principles for viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear degenerate elliptic equations that satisfy some conditions of partial non-degeneracy instead of the usual uniform ellipticity or strict monotonicity. These results are applied to the well-posedness of the Dirichlet problem under suitable conditions at the characteristic points of the boundary. The examples motivating the theory are operators of the form of sum of squares of vector fields plus a nonlinear first order Hamiltonian and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the property (3), it suffices to show that for each fixed x 0 ∈ Ω and each fixed v ∈ C 2 (Ω) with D 2 v(x 0 ) ∈ Θ(x 0 ) one has (3.16) w := u + v ∈ SA(x 0 ). 2 We recall that u * (x) := lim sup…”
Section: The Comparison Principle For Uniformly Continuous Elliptic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prove the property (3), it suffices to show that for each fixed x 0 ∈ Ω and each fixed v ∈ C 2 (Ω) with D 2 v(x 0 ) ∈ Θ(x 0 ) one has (3.16) w := u + v ∈ SA(x 0 ). 2 We recall that u * (x) := lim sup…”
Section: The Comparison Principle For Uniformly Continuous Elliptic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) where Ω ⊂ R N is a bounded open domain with C 2 boundary and ϕ and F are given continuous functions. More precisely, we will examine the validity of the comparison principle for (1.1) and the well posedness of(1.1)-(1.2) by way of Perron's method for admissible viscosity solutions u of elliptic branches of the equation in the sense of Krylov [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. The Comparison Principle in bounded sets under the first condition in (4.3) is standard [24], whereas under the second condition it is Corollary 4.1 in [12].…”
Section: Quasilinear Hypoelliptic Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a class of equations that can be written in Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman form we can show that w := u − v is a subsolution of a homogeneous PDE F 0 (x, w, Dw, D 2 w) = 0 satisfying the SMP, and therefore we deduce immediately the SCP. A model problem is the equation (6) M + ((D 2 X u) * ) + H(x, Du) = 0, where M + denotes the Pucci's maximal operator (see Section 3.1 for the definition),X = (X 1 , ..., X m ) are Hörmander vector fields, and H(x, p) = sup α {p · b α (x) + f α (x)} with data b α , f α bounded and Lipschitz uniformly in α. Remarkably, this result implies the (weak) Comparison Principle also in some cases for which it was not yet known, see Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%