Electron Microscopy 1962
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-2795-5.50072-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Distortion in Dimensions Produced by Shadowing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant plates were then examined under a binocular dissecting microscope with a calibrated scale in one eyepiece. The diameters of the chylomicrons were measured in the axis at right angles to the shadow [Mistra and Das Gupta, 1965]. This measurement was checked against polystyrene spheres of known diameter of 880±80 and 5570±100 A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant plates were then examined under a binocular dissecting microscope with a calibrated scale in one eyepiece. The diameters of the chylomicrons were measured in the axis at right angles to the shadow [Mistra and Das Gupta, 1965]. This measurement was checked against polystyrene spheres of known diameter of 880±80 and 5570±100 A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle sizes were measured on photographic negatives (X 40,500) or on corresponding prints (total magnification X 110,000) with an optical microcomparitor. 5 The maximum diameter of each particle was measured in the axis at right angles to its shadow (23). The diameters of 600 randomly chosen particles were measured after shadow casting of particles separated from pooled biopsy homogenates taken from six different fasting volunteers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to determine the distortion of Pt replicated particles perpendicular to the shadow direction has produced metalcoated particle width distributions which are similar to log normal distributions (Hall, 1960;Misra and Das Gupta, 1965). The means of these distributions were estimated to be 5.7-7.6 nm larger than the diameter of the protein.…”
Section: Modeling How the Metal Replication Film Forms Around Particlmentioning
confidence: 99%