Offshore Technology Conference 1982
DOI: 10.4043/4309-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Component Mooring Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the OCIMF has met these design conditions at many port terminals worldwide (OCIMF, 2008). Nonetheless, when waves are the dominant action, to carry out a static analysis makes no sense and a dynamic analysis is needed instead (Nakajima et al, 1982;Natarajan and Ganapathy, 1995).…”
Section: Mooring Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the OCIMF has met these design conditions at many port terminals worldwide (OCIMF, 2008). Nonetheless, when waves are the dominant action, to carry out a static analysis makes no sense and a dynamic analysis is needed instead (Nakajima et al, 1982;Natarajan and Ganapathy, 1995).…”
Section: Mooring Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now, several models of seabed mechanics have been proposed [6,[9][10][11] . In this paper, we proposed a new kind of seabed model, which can account for rebound, friction, impact in three dimensions.…”
Section: Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas et al [10] described a more detailed model through the use of lumped mass method; their model accounted for both friction and soil suction; the liftoff and grounding of mooring lines were also taken into consideration based on the prior formulations of Nakajima et al [11] and Dutta [12] . Liu et al [13] used numerical simulations to study the effect of friction between the line and sea floor from the time and frequency domains, and concluded that friction due to in-plane motion does contribute to mooring line damping depending on the excitation amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is only valid for small dynamic motions about the static touchdown point. A second method is the lift-off and grounding approach described by Nakajima et al [66] and Thomas [90]. In this method, the mass of the discrete nodes or elements is reduced to zero as they approach the bottom.…”
Section: Forcing Boundary and Materials Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%