1986
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(86)90037-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dynamics of a multicomponent mooring line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach, illustrated in Figure 1 The model calculates the hydrodynamic loads directly at the node points rather than the more common approach of calculating the hydrodynamic forces at the segment midpoints and then distributing them to the node points (eg. Walton and Polachek, 1959;Khan and Ansari, 1986 Figure 2).…”
Section: Lumped-mass Mooring Line Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this approach, illustrated in Figure 1 The model calculates the hydrodynamic loads directly at the node points rather than the more common approach of calculating the hydrodynamic forces at the segment midpoints and then distributing them to the node points (eg. Walton and Polachek, 1959;Khan and Ansari, 1986 Figure 2).…”
Section: Lumped-mass Mooring Line Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model provided convincing though unvalidated results showing that dynamics matter to the mooring loads. Khan and Ansari (1986) developed a lumped-mass approach in three dimensions. As in the previous case, the cable segments are assumed rigid and massless and subject to hydrodynamic forces, while the masses are concentrated at the node points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A longline aquaculture system is essentially an underwater system of interconnected lines of various materials. The dynamics of such a system can be studied with different methods: Finite-difference [11,12], lumped-mass [13][14][15][16] and the inclusion of bending and torsion on cable segments by finite elements analysis (FEA) [17][18][19]. In lumped-mass approach, the governing equations are discretized in space, whereas it is discretized in space and time in finite-difference models [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution to Equation 5is commonly found using a finite element (FE) method where the mooring lines are discretized into several elements, and it is possible to advance in time and space by using a range of different methods with different orders of accuracy [15]. An approximation commonly used in mooring analysis tools is the lumped mass approach [16][17][18][19][20]. This can denote that the FE mass matrix is approximated with a lumped mass matrix where the properties of each element are redistributed to the elemental nodes, which results in a diagonal mass matrix and, therefore, eases the calculations and reduces the simulation time.…”
Section: Dynamic Modeling Of Floating Wecs With Mooringsmentioning
confidence: 99%