On the Economic Geography of International Migration

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu We exploit the bilateral and skill dimensions from recent data sets of international migration to test for the existence of Zipf's and Gibrat's Laws in the context of aggregate and highskilled international immigration and emigration using graphical, parametric and nonparametric analysis. The top tails of the distributions of aggregate and high-skilled immigrants and emigrants adhere to a Pareto distribution with an exponent of unity i.e. Zipf's Law holds. We find some evidence in favour of Gibrat's Law holding for immigration stocks, i.e. that the growth in stocks is independent of their initial values and stronger evidence that immigration densities are diverging over time. Conversely, emigrant stocks are converging in the sense that countries with smaller emigrant stocks are growing faster than their larger sovereign counterparts. Lastly, high skilled immigration and emigration stocks expressed in levels or as densities all exhibit signs of convergence. We conclude by discussing some competing mechanisms that could be driving the observed patterns including: differing fertility rates, reductions in emigration restrictions, migrant sorting and selective immigration policies, immigrant networks and persisting wage differentials. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SJEL Classification: F22, J61, O15

Understanding Brexit

“…The same idea holds when it comes to the free mobility of labor. Economic mainstream tells us that labor mobility generally is welfare‐enhancing but usually comes with negative distributional effects (Özden and Parsons 2015). When the UK, jointly with Ireland, opted in the event of the eastern enlargement of the EU in 2004 for the immediate free movement of people, it was a decision that was very much in line with the comparative advantage principle of open economies.…”

International Migration and City Growth in the Global South: An Analysis of IPUMS Data for Seven Countries, 1992–2013

“…While the role of internal migration in city growth is diversifying and potentially declining, we know almost nothing about international movements. International migration has concerned a growing number of developing countries and has increasingly taken place between them, since 1960—from less‐ to more‐urbanized countries (Czaika and de Haas 2014; Özden and Parsons 2015; Abel and Sander 2014). Yet evidence about the subnational origins and destinations of these flows is almost completely nonexistent in the global South.…”

High-Skilled Migration in Times of Global Economic Crisis

“…The US is the outlier in terms of absolute numbers of high-skilled foreign-born workers, although Canada, the UK and Australia all fare relatively well. Importantly, it is also these four countries that have experienced the greatest absolute growth in their high-skilled stocks between 2000 and 2010, meaning that the existing inequalities (see Özden and Parsons 2015) are being compounded over time and have even increased despite (or because of) the global economic crisis.…”