1986
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(86)90458-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the effects of heat treatments on the creep behaviour of a single crystal superalloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these circumstances, creep deformation is best limited by a uniform and regular precipitate structure. [10,28] In fact, creep relaxation occurs during TMF testing, as can be seen at the hot end of the first TMF cycle for microstructures 1 through 3 ( Figure 22). One can see that microstructure 1 exhibits superior creep relaxation behavior at both mechanical strain range conditions considered.…”
Section: Discussion: On the Damage Mechanisms Occurring In Tmfmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Under these circumstances, creep deformation is best limited by a uniform and regular precipitate structure. [10,28] In fact, creep relaxation occurs during TMF testing, as can be seen at the hot end of the first TMF cycle for microstructures 1 through 3 ( Figure 22). One can see that microstructure 1 exhibits superior creep relaxation behavior at both mechanical strain range conditions considered.…”
Section: Discussion: On the Damage Mechanisms Occurring In Tmfmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Actually, Ni-based single crystal superalloys exhibit superior creep resistance at temperature as high as 1100°C [2] due to their particular microstructure, consisting of 70% in volume of coherently precipitated γ' cubes (L1 2 lattice) separated by thin channels of face centered cubic (fcc) γ matrix [3]. Extensive literature is devoted to the study of their properties, especially on isothermal creep over a wide range of stress and temperature [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Two temperature/stress domains can be distinguished: (1) at low temperature (T < 950°C) and high stress, no significant evolution of the initial optimal microstructure occurs during the creep experiment, while (2) at higher temperature/lower stress, great modifications of the microstructure are observed during primary creep stage: rafting of the γ' phase perpendicular to the applied stress for negative γ/γ' misfit alloys and development of stable dislocation networks at the γ/γ' interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last three decades, the effects of rafting on the creep behaviour have been discussed controversially in a number of papers [2,7,11,12,13,14]. It has to be mentioned that, in these investigations, all raft structures formed during tensile creep (for 6~0) and were oriented perpendicular to the stress axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%