2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the efficiency of flat slabs strengthening against punching using externally bonded fibre reinforced polymers

Abstract: Type of publication:Peer reviewed journal article FRP's can be effectively used to strengthen existing flat slabs against punching shear. The CSCT can be applied to predict the punching strength of strengthened slabs using FRP's. The strengthening efficiency is more pronounced in slabs with lower reinforcement ratio and larger column sizes. The strengthening efficiency is less pronounced in actual continuous flat slabs. a r t i c l e i n f o b s t r a c tOne possibility for strengthening existing flat slabs c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although detailed calculation of the load–rotation relationship can be performed (considering quadri‐linear moment–curvature diagrams incorporating cracking and tension‐stiffening effects), the use of a non‐linear parabolic law (derived from the quadri‐linear model) has shown to be efficient for design purposes in terms of accuracy and ease of use: ψ=kmrsdfyEsmsmR3false/2, where r s refers to the distance between the axis of the supported area and the line of zero radial moment, d is the effective depth, f y and E s are respectively the yield strength and the modulus of elasticity of flexural reinforcement, m s is the average acting bending moment in the support strip (see, e.g., Reference for its definition), m R is the average moment capacity in the support strip, and k m is a factor whose value depends on the level of refinement used to estimate the acting bending moment (value of 1.2 for refined analysis or 1.5 otherwise) . It can be noted that an advantage of this approach is that tailored load–rotation relationships can be developed for particular cases …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although detailed calculation of the load–rotation relationship can be performed (considering quadri‐linear moment–curvature diagrams incorporating cracking and tension‐stiffening effects), the use of a non‐linear parabolic law (derived from the quadri‐linear model) has shown to be efficient for design purposes in terms of accuracy and ease of use: ψ=kmrsdfyEsmsmR3false/2, where r s refers to the distance between the axis of the supported area and the line of zero radial moment, d is the effective depth, f y and E s are respectively the yield strength and the modulus of elasticity of flexural reinforcement, m s is the average acting bending moment in the support strip (see, e.g., Reference for its definition), m R is the average moment capacity in the support strip, and k m is a factor whose value depends on the level of refinement used to estimate the acting bending moment (value of 1.2 for refined analysis or 1.5 otherwise) . It can be noted that an advantage of this approach is that tailored load–rotation relationships can be developed for particular cases …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to propose an ad hoc design approach based on the CSCT. The authors have followed a similar method to that used by Faria et al (2014) for slabs strengthened with FRP strips on the upper face, but defined a new failure criterion and a new load-rotation curve ( Figure 4). Finally, the proposed method was validated by comparison with results of an experimental campaign carried out at the Department of Civil Engineering, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Fernandes et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each curve inFigure 7, the fundamental parameters to consider are the uncracked stiffness, the critical moment that characterizes the change to the cracked phase, cross-section cracked stiffness (before and/or after yielding of existing reinforcement), and ultimate flexural moment. This approach was also used byFaria et al in (2014), concerning the strengthening of flat slabs with FRP strips. Appendix A and B provide all the elements required for the determination of the listed parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In den letzten Jahren wurde eine Vielzahl von Methoden zur nachträglichen Durchstanzverstärkung entwickelt . Ein Überblick kann entnommen werden.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified