2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the efficiency of techniques for the reduction of impulsive noise in astronomical images

Abstract: The impulsive noise in astronomical images originates from various sources. It develops as a result of thermal generation in pixels, collision of cosmic rays with image sensor or may be induced by high readout voltage in Electron Multiplying CCD (EMCCD). It is usually efficiently removed by employing the dark frames or by averaging several exposures. Unfortunately, there are some circumstances, when either the observed objects or positions of impulsive pixels evolve and therefore each obtained image has to be … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is a reduction of the impulsive noise in difference images. There are many techniques that address the problem (see, e.g., Popowicz et al 2016) and we will search for one that will be optimal for BRITE data. Other planned changes to the photometric pipeline are discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is a reduction of the impulsive noise in difference images. There are many techniques that address the problem (see, e.g., Popowicz et al 2016) and we will search for one that will be optimal for BRITE data. Other planned changes to the photometric pipeline are discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practical astronomical observation, the captured images are usually contaminated by different kinds of noises. Since there is no single algorithm that can deal with all noise scenarios, more suitable filters should be adopted or designed to reduce noise 23 . The noise of all the images used for SR reconstruction may have the same probability distribution function, but that of each pixel in one image is somewhat random.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, impulse noise will be understood as a faulty pixel, often called "hot", which can take different values, but for a given pixel the value is approximately constant. Such a noise model can be added based on dark frames obtained for various real image sensors [20]. In our case, we did not analyze impulsive noise; this is due to the fact that in the case of modern imaging sensors impulsive noise is relatively small and easy to effectively remove from the raw images, however impulsive noise data obtained from real camera were also included in our data set (The noisy images are available at: https://tiny.pl/t6xtj).…”
Section: Synthetic Noise Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%