2016
DOI: 10.1017/s104909651500116x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Ethics of Crowdsourced Research

Abstract: This article examines the ethics of crowdsourcing in social science research, with reference to my own experience using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. As these types of research tools become more common in scholarly work, we must acknowledge that many participants are not one-time respondents or even hobbyists. Many people work long hours completing surveys and other tasks for very low wages, relying on those incomes to meet their basic needs. I present my own experience of interviewing Mechanical Turk participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second concern is whether the use of MTurk samples is ethical, mostly because generally the payment for participants is very low: the average payment for a survey translates to an hourly wage about $2 an hour for workers in the United States (Ross et al 2010). To account for this, in line with suggestions by Williamson (2016), we paid an hourly wage, which was greater than the federal minimum hourly wage ($7.25), of approximately $10 per hour.…”
Section: Data and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second concern is whether the use of MTurk samples is ethical, mostly because generally the payment for participants is very low: the average payment for a survey translates to an hourly wage about $2 an hour for workers in the United States (Ross et al 2010). To account for this, in line with suggestions by Williamson (2016), we paid an hourly wage, which was greater than the federal minimum hourly wage ($7.25), of approximately $10 per hour.…”
Section: Data and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williamson, 2014): Each subject received a detailed HIT description before accepting participation (informed consent). Participation was anonymous.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, with its emphasis on crowd sourcing and public engagement (as exemplifi ed by projects like Transcribe Bentham which invites members of the public to transcribe the manuscripts of the philosopher Jeremy Bentham (Causer and Wallace 2012 )), DH has seen a stronger participation of the non-specialist than has recently been the norm in the Humanities. Nevertheless, the ethics of crowd sourcing is increasingly questioned of late (Williamson 2016 ). In many cases, 'doing' DH necessitates the purchasing of equipment, the hiring of professionals skilled in programming and computing and the paying of costs associated with the hosting and longer-term maintenance of digital resources.…”
Section: Dh (C2006-present)mentioning
confidence: 99%