On the Evaluation of Mesh Resolution for Large-Eddy Simulation of Internal Flows Using Openfoam

Abstract

The central aim of this paper is to use OpenFOAM for the assessment of mesh resolution requirements for large-eddy simulation (LES) of flows similar to the ones which occur inside the draft-tube of hydraulic turbines at off-design operating conditions. The importance of this study is related to the fact that hydraulic turbines often need to be operated over an extended range of operating conditions, which makes the investigation of fluctuating stresses crucial. Scale-resolving simulation (SRS) approaches, such as LES and detached-eddy simulation (DES), have received more interests in the recent decade for understanding and mitigating unsteady operational behavior of hydro turbines. This interest is due to their ability to resolve a larger part of turbulent flows. However, verification studies in LES are very challenging, since errors in numerical discretization, but also subgrid-scale (SGS) models, are both influenced by grid resolution. A comprehensive examination of the literature shows that SRS for different operating conditions of hydraulic turbines is still quite limited and that there is no consensus on mesh resolution requirement for SRS studies. Therefore, the goal of this research is to develop a reliable framework for the validation and verification of SRS, especially LES, so that it can be applied for the investigation of flow phenomena inside hydraulic turbine draft-tube and runner at their off-design operating conditions. Two academic test cases are considered in this research, a turbulent channel flow and a case of sudden expansion. The sudden expansion test case resembles the flow inside the draft-tube of hydraulic turbines at part load. In this study, we concentrate on these academic test cases, but it is expected that hydraulic turbine flow simulations will eventually benefit from the results of the current research. The results show that two-point autocorrelation is more sensitive to mesh resolution than energy spectra. In addition, for the case of sudden expansion, the mesh resolution has a tremendous effect on the results, and, so far, we have not capture an asymptotic converging behavior in the results of Root Mean Square (RMS) of velocity fluctuations and two-point autocorrelation. This case, which represents complex flow behavior, needs further mesh resolution studies.

Numerical investigation of respiratory drops dynamics released during vocalization

“…The turbulent length-scale was set to three times the mesh scale for producing flow structures that persist through the domain. 97 Moghadam et al 98 investigated the effect of this parameter in a channel flow, finding a good agreement with 3 cells per eddy for capturing non-decaying turbulence fluctuations. Increasing this value to 5 required more computational effort but did not demonstrate a significant improvement in the flow characteristics.…”

Numerical Modelling of the 3D Unsteady Flow of an Inlet Particle Separator for Turboshaft Engines

“…The difference between PL OUT predicted by the coarsest mesh and the finest mesh is less than 5%. Preliminary RANS simulations allow the initial LES resolution factor S [11] to be estimated as the ratio between the integral length scale and the grid size:…”

Effects of Damaged Rotor on Wake Dynamics of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

“…The outer section of the domain was meshed with 100 mm tetrahedral elements. It is well-established that a mesh suitable for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is not suitable for Scale-Resolving Simulations (SRS), such as LES [27]. The aforementioned element sizes were chosen after a number of initial simulations in order to find the optimal mesh size, where optimal in this context means the balance be- It is well-established that a mesh suitable for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is not suitable for Scale-Resolving Simulations (SRS), such as LES [27].…”

“…It is well-established that a mesh suitable for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is not suitable for Scale-Resolving Simulations (SRS), such as LES [27]. The aforementioned element sizes were chosen after a number of initial simulations in order to find the optimal mesh size, where optimal in this context means the balance be- It is well-established that a mesh suitable for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is not suitable for Scale-Resolving Simulations (SRS), such as LES [27]. The aforementioned element sizes were chosen after a number of initial simulations in order to find the optimal mesh size, where optimal in this context means the balance between the computational cost and the percentage of Turbulent Kinetic Energy (k) captured within the flow domain (especially in the VAWT and the wake region).…”