2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72526-0_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Experimental Evaluation of the Fracture Toughness of Shape Memory Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that C2 results in a smaller hysteresis loop, relative to the reference material (C1), and that the reduction in temperature of C3 results in lower stress transformation thresholds. The same fracture properties are assumed for all cases; namely, a toughness of Gc=22.5 kJ/m 2 , based on the data reported for NiTi, 63 and a length scale of =0.145 mm, which corresponds to a strength of 600 MPa according to Equation (3A). Symmetric tension‐compression behavior is assumed but the focus will be on tensile behavior; case studies where the load ratio R is positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that C2 results in a smaller hysteresis loop, relative to the reference material (C1), and that the reduction in temperature of C3 results in lower stress transformation thresholds. The same fracture properties are assumed for all cases; namely, a toughness of Gc=22.5 kJ/m 2 , based on the data reported for NiTi, 63 and a length scale of =0.145 mm, which corresponds to a strength of 600 MPa according to Equation (3A). Symmetric tension‐compression behavior is assumed but the focus will be on tensile behavior; case studies where the load ratio R is positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we assume a uniform transformation strain, such that in (8), H = H min = H max . Regarding the material toughness, a value of 22.5 kJ/m 2 is adopted from the range of reported data for NiTi [60],…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high stresses of the transformation region dominate the crack growth resistance of SMAs and result in energy dissipation and material toughening [12,13]. Finite element models have been developed to predict the role of transformation toughening and reverse transformation on crack propagation [5,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that C2 results in a smaller hysteresis loop, relative to the reference material (C1), and that the reduction in temperature of C3 results in lower stress transformation thresholds. The same fracture properties are assumed for all cases; namely, a toughness of G c = 22.5 kJ/m 2 , based on the data reported for NiTi 63 , and a length scale of ℓ = 0.145 mm, which corresponds to a strength of 600 MPa according to Eq. (3)a. Symmetric tension-compression behaviour is assumed but the focus will be on tensile behaviour; case studies where the load ratio R is positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%