2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45816-6_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Expressive Power of Data Integration Systems

Abstract: Abstract. There are basically two approaches for designing a data integration system. In the global-as-view (GAV) approach, one maps the concepts in the global schema to views over the sources, whereas in the local-as-view (LAV) approach, one maps the sources into views over the global schema. The goal of this paper is to relate the two approaches with respect to their expressive power. The analysis is carried out in a relational database setting, where both the queries on the global schema, and the views in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Schema matching is the task of semiautomatically finding correspondences between two heterogeneous schemas. Several applications relying on schema matching have arisen and have been widely studied by the database, AI communities and more recently document engineering community [18], [7], [17].…”
Section: Schema Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schema matching is the task of semiautomatically finding correspondences between two heterogeneous schemas. Several applications relying on schema matching have arisen and have been widely studied by the database, AI communities and more recently document engineering community [18], [7], [17].…”
Section: Schema Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For modeling the relation between the sources and the global schema, two basic approaches have been proposed [10,25,36]. The first approach, called Globalas-View (GaV), expresses the global schema in terms of the data sources.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed approach is very similar to our approach except for the following differences. The first difference is that they use a local-as-view (LaV) approach [10] with a hypothetical global ontology that may be incomplete. The second difference is that they do not retain the XML documents' structures in their conceptual mediator so they cannot deal with the reverse query translation (from the XML sources to the mediator).…”
Section: Semantic Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge created by the increase and the diversity of information sources on the web, and by the need of organizations to interoperate database systems not only consists of the need to use tools for integrating data [3][5] [9][10] among multiple users and heterogeneous information sources, but also the necessity of these tools to overcome the limitations of current search engines by allowing not only users to ask queries more sophisticated than simple keywords, but also being able to aggregate other elements of answers from different sources to build, in the most optimized possible way by time and space research, the analytical global response to the user query. This need is becoming increasingly relevant for medical information, especially with the existence of a multitude of web sources specific to medicine areas and the trend towards computerization of patient medical records [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%