2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11118-020-09877-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Failure of Multilinear Multiplier Theorem with Endpoint Smoothness Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that the condition (1.9) is sharp in the sense that if the condition does not hold, then there exists σ such that the estimate (1.10) fails for the corresponding operators T σ . Refer to [21] for more details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that the condition (1.9) is sharp in the sense that if the condition does not hold, then there exists σ such that the estimate (1.10) fails for the corresponding operators T σ . Refer to [21] for more details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the space L 2 (s 1 ,...,sm) ((R n ) m ) indicates the product type Sobolev space on (R n ) m , in which the norm is defined by replacing the term (1+4π 2 | ξ| 2 ) s in (1.6) by m j=1 1+4π 2 |ξ j | 2 s j . It is known in [27] that the condition (1.8) is sharp in the sense that if the condition does not hold, then there exists σ such that the corresponding operator T σ does not satisfy (1.10). We also refer the reader to [6,11] for weighted estimates for multilinear Fourier multipliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Necessary condition. In order to prove the direction (1.8) ⇒ (1.7) in Theorem 1.1, two different multipliers will be constructed based on an idea contained in [25]. However, the methods in [25] essentially rely on Plancherel's theorem to obtain the upper bound of…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%