1996
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00229-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the free-settling test for estimating activated sludge floc density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
109
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
109
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although biohydrogen flocs examined here had similar fractal dimensions to other biological aggregates, they were much more dense than other biological aggregates, as evidenced by their lower porosities. Activated sludge flocs larger than 0.1 cm typically have a porosity greater than 0.95 (Li and Ganczarczyk, 1990;Lee et al, 1996; Yuan, 2002;Li et al, 2003). However, most biohydrogen flocs examined here had porosities that were less than 0.95.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although biohydrogen flocs examined here had similar fractal dimensions to other biological aggregates, they were much more dense than other biological aggregates, as evidenced by their lower porosities. Activated sludge flocs larger than 0.1 cm typically have a porosity greater than 0.95 (Li and Ganczarczyk, 1990;Lee et al, 1996; Yuan, 2002;Li et al, 2003). However, most biohydrogen flocs examined here had porosities that were less than 0.95.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, most biohydrogen flocs examined here had porosities that were less than 0.95. As a result, biohydrogen reactor flocs settled faster than the similarly sized activated sludge aggregates (Lee et al, 1996;Li and Yuan, 2002). Highly permeable inorganic flocs have been found to settle 4 -8.3 times faster than predicted by Stokes' law due to flow through the aggregate (Johnson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S3). As the fractal dimension decreased from 3.0, 2.5 to 2.0, according to the numerical simulation results, the mean size also reduced from 115 m, 39 m to 12 m. It is well known that fractal aggregates become more porous as they increase in size [7,23,[36][37][38]. Therefore, large aggregates with a lower fractal dimension would be much weaker in structure and hence more vulnerable to shear breakage.…”
Section: Effect Of the Fractal Dimension On The Breakage Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 86%