2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2014.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Gauss E ϒPHKA theorem and some allied inequalities

Abstract: We use the 1907 Hurwitz formula along with the Jacobi triple product identity to understand representation properties of two JP (Jones-Pall) forms of Kaplansky: 9x 2 + 16y 2 + 36z 2 + 16yz + 4xz + 8xy and 9x 2 + 17y 2 + 32z 2 − 8yz + 8xz + 6xy. We also discuss three nontrivial analogues of the Gauss E Υ PHKA theorem. The technique used can be applied to all known spinor regular ternary quadratic forms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each of the 27 spinor regular ternaries that are alone in their spinor genus, Aygin et al [1] summarize in Table A.17 the list of all positive integers not represented by the form. As detailed in that paper, the results for several of these forms appeared earlier in work of Lomadze [12] and Berkovich [3]. However, for the remaining two forms which are not alone in their spinor genus, the method of [1] yields only the even integers that fail to be represented.…”
Section: Forms Not Alone In Their Spinor Genusmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For each of the 27 spinor regular ternaries that are alone in their spinor genus, Aygin et al [1] summarize in Table A.17 the list of all positive integers not represented by the form. As detailed in that paper, the results for several of these forms appeared earlier in work of Lomadze [12] and Berkovich [3]. However, for the remaining two forms which are not alone in their spinor genus, the method of [1] yields only the even integers that fail to be represented.…”
Section: Forms Not Alone In Their Spinor Genusmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The third and fourth assertions are trivial. Now, by using the above corollary and spinor representation theory of quadratic forms, we reprove Theorems (1.9), (1.10) and (1,11) in [3]. To do these, we define ternary quadratic forms:…”
Section: Representations Of Quadratic Forms With Some Congruence Condmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the second case which corresponds to Theorem (1.10) of [3]. Note that r s2 B2,w2 p8n`1, M 2 q " |tpx, y, zq t P Z 3 : x 2`y2`2 z 2 " 8n`1, px, y, zq " p1, 4, 0qpmod p4, 16, 2qqu| " |tpx, y, zq t P Z 3 : p4x`1q 2`p 16y`4q 2`2 p2zq 2 " 8n`1u| " |tpx, y, zq t P Z 3 : p4x`1q 2`1 6p4y`1q 2`8 z 2 " 8n`1u| " 1 4 |tpx, y, zq t P Z 3 : p2x`1q 2`1 6p2y`1q 2`8 z 2 " 8n`1u| " 1 4 |tpx, y, zq t P Z 3 : x 2`1 6y 2`8 z 2 " 8n`1,px, y, zq " p1, (iii) r s6 B6,w6 p16n`2, M 6 q " 0 if and only if 16n`2 " 2M 2 and all prime divisors of M are congruent to 1 modulo 4 and r s6 B6,w6 p16n`10, M 6 q ą 0.…”
Section: Representations Of Quadratic Forms With Some Congruence Condmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation